Guilty pleasure?

Picture Romance is the bestselling fiction genre, and yet, it is often dismissed as being “fluff” or a “guilty pleasure.” Like a “sharing size” bag of peanut M&Ms you don’t share, many readers are embarrassed that they love to read love stories. Heck, I used to emphasize that I wrote historical fiction and then would mumble under my breath, “historical romance fiction.” We’ve been led to believe that unless a book made Oprah’s book club or was fit to be dissected in a graduate level literature class, it had no real worth. Even the ubiquitous “cozy” murder mystery has been considered smarter? More thought worthy? 
 
Well, I’m done with being “ashamed” of loving reading and writing romance. Here’s why: nearly every great work of literature has, at its core, a deep relationship that evolves throughout the story. And very often, those relationships are romantic ones. They may not follow some of the strictures of a romance (a guaranteed happy ending being one), but they are, in essence, a romance.
 
It is not outrageous to propose that romance is looked down upon in the literary world because it is largely written by women, for women. Consider Nicholas Sparks’ books. They are listed primarily as Contemporary Fiction, Family Fiction, and even Animal Fiction (I was today years old when I learned this was a genre!). Eleven of his books have been made into movies! 
 
Now I’m not bitter—I love an author’s success and I love that people love reading books about relationships (duh!). I just think we need to recognize that many authors like Sparks are writing romances, but they’re dodging the stigma, mostly by being male. Let’s just drop the stigma!
 
Watching two characters evolve, seeing the unfolding of how they interact and grow to love one another is primal human stuff, people! Don’t say reading romance is your “guilty pleasure.” Just enjoy what pleasure it brings you, just like those M&Ms!
 •  2 comments  •  flag
Share on Twitter
Published on January 06, 2022 08:51
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)    post a comment »
dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Sara (new)

Sara I am one for whom romance was a guilty pleasure but I learned to appreciate it as legitimate literature. I have always been a big reader all my life But before graduate school, I never read romances as I thought they were beneath me. In graduate school, I pretty much stopped reading for pleasure. My reading was all math and science and foreign languages. All work and no play. Then one day a friend left her book bag at my house and a book spilled out. I don’t remember the title, something about a moon. It was a blue cover with a beautiful full-busted woman in old-timey windswept clothes. I flipped it open and found myself lost in the story. I read the whole thing in 3 hours. I was hooked. It was the 80’s and bodice rippers were all in style and I loved them. I found them light and fun and just the thing I needed to get my head out of work. My first husband said he felt they gave false expectations to women to which I repled so does ”MIss Centerfold” for men.
I did find myself defending them from time to time, but my mom read thrillers and my best friend ate Agatha Christe novels like candy. So to each their own. Some romances are the deeper literature, and I do agree that much deep literature could qualify as romance in many ways. Now I am an old lady I mostly read nonfiction for fun these days but I still seek out and enjoy a good romance every now and then.


message 2: by Michelle (new)

Michelle Morrison I love this, Sara!


back to top