Play Dirty: Shane Black’s Stylish Return, Minus the Stakes

I went into Play Dirty curious. I just wrote about Amazon Prime movies I’ve seen and whether I thought they could make it in theaters. This movie is a perfect test case for that. Mark Wahlberg starring in a Shane Black movie sounded like a throwback to the kind of crime thrillers Hollywood used to make — fast-talking, violent, and funny in that offbeat Shane Black way. Black wrote Lethal Weapon, The Last Boy Scout, Kiss Kiss Bang Bang — all built around the same DNA: flawed men, hard-boiled action, and snappy dialogue.

Those movies were big in the ’80s and ’90s, but we don’t see many like them anymore. So when Play Dirty hit streaming, I wondered if it might bring that energy back — a slick, mid-budget, non-franchise crime story at a time when almost everything in theaters is either a sequel or a superhero movie.

Thanks for reading Bill Garrison! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.

The Movie: Smart Setup, Uneven Execution

Wahlberg plays Parker, a crook and thief adapted from Donald Westlake’s novels. I’ve read a few of Westlake’s books, but none of the “Parker” series, so it’s new to me. He’s not a hero — he steals, lies, and kills his way through high-stakes heists. From the opening scenes, the movie establishes that world fast. But something feels off almost immediately: the sheer amount of killing.

Parker and his crew take down bad guys, but innocent bystanders also die — casually, without hesitation or guilt. I’ve seen plenty of violent movies, but the randomness here is what stood out. It’s unclear whether the violence is meant to be satirical, the way Shane Black sometimes exaggerates things for dark comedy, or whether it’s just lazy storytelling. Either way, it dulls the impact.

The first half of the movie moves briskly, mixing action with Shane Black’s trademark wit — a few clever one-liners, a few moments that almost feel like self-parody. But the film really comes alive once Parker meets his team. Led by Keegan-Michael Key, the group dynamic is easily the most enjoyable part of the movie. The banter works, the chemistry clicks, and it feels like we’re watching a better, more playful film within the film.

Honestly, Play Dirty might’ve been stronger if the whole movie revolved around the crew. Those sections are fun to watch, even if the comedy isn’t consistent. They remind you how good Shane Black can be at creating characters who irritate and amuse each other at the same time.

What Doesn’t Work

For all its momentum, the movie never quite finds its tone. The blend of comedy and brutality doesn’t gel. It’s too violent to be lighthearted, too glib to be serious.

By the time we reach the final act, a late plot reveal tries to explain the reckless violence, but the motivation is weak and unconvincing. The bigger problem is that the movie never makes us feel like Parker is really in danger. There’s no real tension, no sense of risk. He’s always one step ahead, always confident, always bulletproof — which makes the stakes feel weightless.

That’s what separates this from Shane Black’s best work. In Lethal Weapon or The Nice Guys, the heroes were funny but vulnerable; the danger felt real even when the dialogue sparkled. In Play Dirty, it’s like the heart fell out somewhere along the way.

Would It Have Worked in Theaters?

Honestly, maybe. With Wahlberg’s star power and a marketing push behind Shane Black’s name, Play Dirty could’ve opened well. It feels cinematic enough — big cast, clean action, stylish direction — to deserve a theatrical run.

But I’m not sure how far it would’ve gone. Shane Black’s biggest hits were twenty or thirty years ago, and his brand of cynical, wisecracking action might not connect with today’s audiences in the same way.

It’s also worth noting how rare a film like this is now. I remember when Knight and Day with Tom Cruise and Cameron Diaz came out in 2010 — people pointed out that it was an original action story. That was more than a decade ago. Since then, the only action movies that seem to make money are sequels or comic-book properties.

Technically, Play Dirty is based on a book, but for most viewers it will feel original — and that’s part of its charm. Unless you remember Payback, the 1999 Mel Gibson film based on the same Parker novels, you’d never know this story wasn’t completely new. And in today’s landscape, that alone makes it stand out.

Final Thoughts

I enjoyed Play Dirty. It’s entertaining in stretches, especially when Wahlberg and his crew are on screen together. But the violence — and the lack of emotional weight behind it — kept nagging at me. It’s a slick movie that looks and feels like a throwback, but it doesn’t carry the same spark or moral center that made Shane Black’s classics work.

Maybe that’s just where we are now. Play Dirty is a reminder of a kind of movie that used to dominate theaters — star-driven, funny, violent, and a little dangerous — and how hard it’s become to make those films resonate in the modern era.

I’ve covered the Christian/Conservative angle on other movies I’ve reviewed. This one’s a standard thriller with violence, language, and brief nudity. The interesting part is Wahlberg — a strong and public professing Catholic — playing this kind of role. No judgment from me at all. The question of whether Christians should take parts like this is a whole other conversation, and not one I’m looking to cover here.

Overall Rank: 688 out of 1,702
It rates in the top third of the movies I’ve seen. It gets that high despite its flaws, because of its originality and humor.
Box Office Potential: 6 out of 10

Thanks for reading Bill Garrison! Subscribe for free to receive new posts and support my work.