Discover new books on Goodreads
Meet your next favorite book
Listopia > The Most Influential Books
Holy books, political books, fiction, whatever. Which books do you think have had the greatest impact and influence (positive or negative) on our world? Please only add books, not documents or essays.
1,497 books ·
5,310 voters ·
list created November 15th, 2008
by Crazy Uncle Ryan (votes) .
2270 likes · Like
Lists are re-scored approximately every 5 minutes.
Crazy Uncle Ryan
456 books
15 friends
15 friends
Susanna - Censored by GoodReads
3388 books
849 friends
849 friends
Alisa
1359 books
37 friends
37 friends
Angel
2549 books
115 friends
115 friends
Ray
1919 books
67 friends
67 friends
Emily
301 books
19 friends
19 friends
Emilytwo
45 books
1 friend
1 friend
Shon
31 books
1 friend
1 friend
More voters…
Comments (showing 73-122)
message 122:
by
Jubilee
(new)
Feb 18, 2025 10:32AM
twighlight is literally more influential than any book every written-literary masterpiece on the levels of the brontes and the bible
reply
|
flag
I have voted for The Gold Bug by Edgar Allan Poe In Polen in 1930-ish a radio operator was inspired by this story to start trying to analyse the German codes (his job was to just copy the signals). This was the start of Polish code breaking before WWII and the first breaking of Enigma. A crucial progress that was later given to the English and gave them a head start. It may have had a direct impact on WWII.
From my reading of this list, it is apparent few understand the meaning of influential. This is more like best-sellers. Not very helpful.
David wrote: "The bible isn't the most influential book ever!"
I agree...after all it was written by men. It should be in the fiction section :)
I agree...after all it was written by men. It should be in the fiction section :)
Ian wrote: "How is the Origin of Spieces above the Bible? It's only been around for 160 years! I can see how it would be no. 1 if this was a list for most influential books nowadays, but c'mon! There've been w..."How about Truth over Fiction for a reason? I like that one.
Rommy wrote: "The Epic of Gilgamesh: No. 1Written ~2100 B.C.E, exerting over 4,000 yrs of influence throughout history."
Yes! Read "The Written World" for an amazing perspective on language, writing, and literature's influence on the progress of civilization. Hint: There wouldn't be any without it.
It has the very exciting story about how The Epic of Gilgamesh was discovered. Blew my mind, and made me mourn for all the rest that has been lost, burnt, destroyed, and suppressed (Vatican City, I'm looking straight at you.)
The Epic of Gilgamesh: No. 1Written ~2100 B.C.E, exerting over 4,000 yrs of influence throughout history.
So terrible list!There is no way Orwell to be so influential like Bible, Shakespeare, Plato and Quran, sorry but Marx and Darwin are also overrated, outside the top 10 would be of good size for both, only a few decades later and few people still are influenced by Communism and Evolution, ...
Martin Luther, Isaac Newton, Mormons Book and Homer should be in the top 10, though.
Mukesh wrote: "The bible isn't the most influential book ever!"Influence doesn't have to be positive. The Bible has probably had more influence on the world than any other book, but much of that influence has been incredibly negative.
Daniel wrote: "Mukesh wrote: "The bible isn't the most influential book ever!"No matter what religion you practice (I'm not a catholic by the way), Guttenberg's edition of the Bible IS the most influential book..."
nope, not the first printed book. the Chinese were way ahead and were printing a thousand years before Guttenburg. G. invented moveable type.
Francisco wrote: "Danna wrote: "George wrote: "Koran is number 3?!!!"yeah.?"
If you ask me this poll is very inflamable... dont get me wrong, if it were inflable AND had a point id be happy, but books are so subj..."
Francisco, Americans are killing Americans, right here, right now, on Ameican soil. But seriously, I must ask, why do you think religious wars should exist at all/
The Old Testament Bible (any version) is heavily influenced by earlier works, especially Sumerian stories. Just saying....
Rik wrote: "Marte wrote: "Faith in humanity restored. The Origin of Species at number one!"So faith in humanity is restored when the book that tells us that we are descended from the apes is at nr. 1? I pref..."
Rik, with all due respect to a fellow reader, that's not what "Origin of Species" says.
The Book of Mormon outranks the Bhagavad Gita even though there are nearly a billion Hindus and only 16 million or so Mormons. I find this very odd. Somebody needs to fix this error in judgment.
Needs more Ovid, Augustine, Gratian, Peter Lombard, Goethe... the list could go on, but you know, influential books that practically everyone knew before WWII or so.
Western bias list, few non-Western people could cite Charles Darwin as the Bible and the Qur'an. Origin of Species had no direct impact on the world, the mere mention of Darwin as influential as Jesus and Muhammad is mere mockery.
This list is just awful.
My books to add to the list:La Comédie Humaine by Honoré de Balzac
The Thousand and One Nights, also called The Arabian Nights
Divine Comedy and Inferno by Dante Alighieri
Great Expectations by Charles Dickens
Les Misérables by Victor Hugo
L'Homme qui Rit by Victor Hugo
The Master and Margarita by Mikhail Bulgakov
The Golden Calf by Ilf and Petrov
Roadside Picnic by Boris Strugatsky, Arkady Strugatsky
The Accursed Kings by Maurice Druon
The Count of Monte Cristo by Alexander Dumas
Sun King, Louis XIV King of France by Alexander Dumas
How is the Origin of Spieces above the Bible? It's only been around for 160 years! I can see how it would be no. 1 if this was a list for most influential books nowadays, but c'mon! There've been wars and martyrs and all that for thousands of years over the Bible. Lke Francisco said, Medieval Europe and everything. How could Darwin have influence over more people in one and a half centuies than than all the billions of people before him put together influenced by the Bible?! These last couple generations havn't been the only ones.
Meh, opinion is subjective, but does not mean that there was no influence. Marx certainly has influence, Rousseau not much. We can not like Shakespeare, but all his genius is there, his metric rhyme, poetry, complex characters and whole their influence in nearly 500 years. The books on the list are not we like or sympathize, but that actually have more impact, whether cultural, political or religious. You may have learned more on political reading Sherlock Holmes, but that does not make him be as politically influential as Marx.
Booklovinglady wrote: "Sharon wrote: "It's really all a matter of one's taste, isn't it?"Isn't it always? :-) Goes for every Lisopia, I'd say."
Yep.
Sharon wrote: "It's really all a matter of one's taste, isn't it?"Isn't it always? :-) Goes for every Lisopia, I'd say.
Thanks, I'm glad you understand my meaning. I learned nothing reading The Confessions, hated it, I stopped half way through.
It doesn't mean I think it had no impact on Western culture.
Lucinda wrote: "Nick I'm sorry to say but it's not because The Social Contract had influence in politics than it's more influential than Sherlock Holmes.Problem is, you don't take the right frame of reference wh..."
You go, Lucinda! I've learned more from fiction - including Sherlock Holmes - than from reading any dry political treatise.
Nick I'm sorry to say but it's not because The Social Contract had influence in politics than it's more influential than Sherlock Holmes.Problem is, you don't take the right frame of reference when you talk about these books.
According to what right can you assert than politics is better viewed than popular culture? I'm sorry to say, but this is a very elitist way of thinking.
Thanks to Conan Doyle, MILLIONS of ppl whatch the series "Sherlock". And you know what? I'm almost sure that half of these ppl don't give a shit about Rousseau or Marx.
To be frank, I don't. I find it dry, badly written literature and I don't care about what they say, and I found the topic extremely boring. So in a way, I would be more like 19th century middle class reader who enjoys penny dreadful and who dislikes politics.
Does that make me a person less capable of thinking? I don't think so. Actually I hate reading newspapers because a lot of what you see written in it is bullshit, many, many journalists write what they think without checking on their sources. Look at the Charlie Hebdo attacks in Paris last january, it's exactly what happened.
And you know what? Marx and Rousseau had their own opinions, and I'm pretty sure some parts of their books are unaccurate, because they see everything through the prism of their own thinking. The reason why I don't like them is because I find them dogmatic. Which is rarely the case with a work of fiction.
It doesn't mean I don't respect these authors and admire how influential they were for 19th century society.
There's a HUGE difference about recognising the degree of influence of some work and your OWN opinion about it. Try to think about that before patronizing ppl who favour Sherlock Holmes over The Capital.
I deleted a few self-published books from the last couple years. Only their authors, living in a world of fantasy and desperation, thought they were influential.
How did hell the Origin of Species is more influential than the Bible, Quran , Shakespeare and Aristotle ? Too few read Darwin , the book has no influence , he only found out what already existed 2,000 years ago with the Greek theory of Evolution, while Shakespeare , Aristotle , Marx and Homer gave us something new and that has lasted much longer than Darwin .Evolution theory has not influenced the lives of millions of people as Bible and Quran. yet George Orwell is more influential than Dante, Homer, Newton and Martin Luther? really?
This is a list of influential books, not what has been read. Whether or not you have read the entire series, the series itself is what was influential, not who read it.
Sharon wrote: "Since the HP boxed set is #29, why list the individual books also? That's redundant."Isn't that assuming everyone read the complete series...?
Ben wrote: "Good list! Surprised Twilight and Harry Potter haven't made their way to the top 100 yet! :o)"
Um, Harry Potter is #29.
I read with interest the discussions on the Bible and the Quran, the Bible versus the Quran, and so on and so forth. Seems rather pointless to me, as they both have been, and still are, hugely influential books, no matter how you look upon it. And does it really matter if either is top of this list or not...?
Most of the fiction on this list doesn't belong, the influence of most of these novels exists primarily in the world of literature. Frankly, Sherlock Holmes wasn't and could never be expected to have the same breadth of impact that certain politically oriented texts here have had.
Sorry for those who made this list and apart from a few books featuring in that I've read, but I found most of it very unappealing… Also the classification "influential in history" is really debatable when you find that Alice in Wonderland and the Social Contract are in the same set.
Francisco wrote: "Danna wrote: "George wrote: "Koran is number 3?!!!"yeah.?"
If you ask me this poll is very inflamable... dont get me wrong, if it were inflable AND had a point id be happy, but books are so subj..."
Quaran, I slogged through it, but influential, yes. I did not vote for it though. I fyou view the world, and history, as a whole it is meaningful, but not overwhelming. The bible has the force of western civilization behind it, but good, not great literature.
Books of all time! I take that to mean across cultures and time. What happened to the Vedantic Texts? I loved them and they are influential. I tend to the political/social contract books. These affect us all, Plato, Aristotle, Hobbes, Locke, Rousseau, and maybe Jefferson. Vote early and often!
Marte wrote: "Faith in humanity restored. The Origin of Species at number one!"So faith in humanity is restored when the book that tells us that we are descended from the apes is at nr. 1? I prefer the book that tells us that God has set us apart from all the other animals. Sounds like a lot more faith in humanity to me.
The Bible has been around for almost 2000 years, started wars, nations have been built upon, people took it all over the globe. The Origin of Species was first published around 150 years ago and has undoubtedly had a great influence on the world and its people, but it cannot have been more influential than the Bible. As a historian (and a Christian, but that is not the point), I cannot agree with the top 2 of this list. The rest, I don't care about. The Qu'ran at 3? Fine with me. Put Origin at 2 for all I care. But the Bible should be at nr. 1!
Yea, I have read most of the list, So do I get a prize or something. ( I finished the bible which most have not , I have not become anything. So what!
I hate to break it to all you people here but the most influential books in the world are actually:The Ramayana
The Bible
The Quran
The Analects of Confucius (not even on this list for some reason)
Just so all the narrow minded people that are questioning why such books are on this list, people do exist in other countries and million upon millions have been influenced by these books over thousands of year.
Rajat wrote: "I am surprised we dont have the 2 Indian Epics on the list...Ramayana and Mahabharata. Over a billion in India and elsewhere read these 2 epics"You've hit on the Eurocentric nature of GR and its players. Add the Indian epics to the list.
Related News
This weekend, take some time and catch up with the latest in the book world!
Let's begin with the books that trended this week on Goodreads. These...
Anyone can add books to this list.
















