Score

Hi there! I'm not sure if anyone would actually receive a notice when I post this comment, but just in case people still check this list, I thought it was worth trying.

This list didn't show up in my search result (probably because how it is uniquely named), and I didn't find it until I was viewing the "trilogies" tags. It is perhaps the closest thing to what I envisioned, but alas, the new list I created has more restrictions so it's not by any means trying to duplicate this one. If anyone here would like a list that's more organized and only having one book representing per trilogy, feel free to check out Best Series: Trilogies. I don't personally know a lot of trilogies and because it was only created yesterday, the list is quite bare at the moment, but I would love to know more. =D

Sammm wrote: "Hi there! I'm not sure if anyone would actually receive a notice when I post this comment, but just in case people still check this list, I thought it was worth trying.

This list didn't show up in..."

Thanks for calling out how "unorganized" my list was. I have since fixed it.

Brooke wrote: "Thanks for calling out how "unorganized" my list was. I have since fixed it. "

Oh dear, now I see how offensive my comment might look like. I wasn't trying to say your list is or was "unorganized"; to be honest, I understand the need of including remaining books in trilogies in a list, just that, personally, I was looking for one that doesn't have them, which was why I created a new one.

There actually have been cases where people added the remaining books to the other list, so like I said, what this particular list was like wasn't "unorganized" or bad or anything! It's just people have different preferences, and I was trying to say, if there's people looking for another kind, there's the other list; that's all. Wasn't trying to imply how you should run a list.