Lew asked Nicholas Fillmore:

Smuggler. In Part 2, towards the end, I interpreted the multiple uses of "site" should have been "sight". The way you wrote in the first part of the book with some irreverent style (a good thing and very well done) brought me to the conclusion that maybe this was another reference to that style. If not, then I missed it. I can be wrong, but I saw it multiple times. Of course it could have been a misprint?

Nicholas Fillmore Hi Lew, appreciate your review. I had a real struggle trying to connect the two parts of this book, but do see the second part as essential to the "whole." Of course living the life and doing time are going to evoke different tones. I do think some of that irreverence reemerges in part two after my comeuppance.... Typos are like weeds, man, they seem to spring up spontaneously. I'll look out for those you pointed out.... FYI, next book is a family drama-type thing. Book 3 will be narrated by Satan ... so more irreverence to come, fear not!

flag