Physics Mathematics Books
Showing 1-50 of 360

by (shelved 7 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.21 — 472,333 ratings — published 1988

by (shelved 7 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.61 — 8,040 ratings — published 1964

by (shelved 7 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.32 — 2,150 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 6 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.16 — 3,127 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 6 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.16 — 8,409 ratings — published 2004

by (shelved 5 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.24 — 4,794 ratings — published 1687

by (shelved 5 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.27 — 215,407 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.20 — 22,855 ratings — published 1916

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.33 — 16,226 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.30 — 7,753 ratings — published 1964

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.18 — 8,331 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 3.81 — 76,480 ratings — published 1884

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.06 — 76,928 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.21 — 30,480 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 4 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.25 — 2,806 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.27 — 19,327 ratings — published 1985

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.49 — 635 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.03 — 40,588 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.28 — 3,700 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.08 — 202,847 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.11 — 5,438 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.04 — 16,970 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 3.98 — 113 ratings — published 1920

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.14 — 5,858 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.40 — 157,095 ratings — published 1980

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 3.99 — 65,382 ratings — published 2014

by (shelved 3 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.10 — 101,616 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 3.59 — 138 ratings — published 1998

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.06 — 21,498 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.31 — 57,085 ratings — published 2005

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.04 — 10,609 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.27 — 10,445 ratings — published 2007

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.32 — 3,347 ratings — published -290

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.35 — 682 ratings — published 2006

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.34 — 39,042 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.38 — 1,518 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.23 — 13,456 ratings — published 1994

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.06 — 6,808 ratings — published 2009

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.45 — 103 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.06 — 3,382 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.25 — 3,255 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.10 — 1,331 ratings — published 1950

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.42 — 542 ratings — published 1958

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.29 — 1,172 ratings — published 1976

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.14 — 494 ratings — published 1991

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.32 — 312 ratings — published 1984

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.30 — 33,076 ratings — published 1997

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 3.95 — 24,241 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 3.91 — 7,582 ratings — published 1989

by (shelved 2 times as physics-mathematics)
avg rating 4.15 — 24,089 ratings — published 1994

“This “Hawking temperature” of a black hole and its “Hawking radiation” (as they came to be called) were truly radical—perhaps the most radical theoretical physics discovery in the second half of the twentieth century. They opened our eyes to profound connections between general relativity (black holes), thermodynamics (the physics of heat) and quantum physics (the creation of particles where before there were none). For example, they led Stephen to prove that a black hole has entropy, which means that somewhere inside or around the black hole there is enormous randomness. He deduced that the amount of entropy (the logarithm of the hole’s amount of randomness) is proportional to the hole’s surface area. His formula for the entropy is engraved on Stephen’s memorial stone at Gonville and Caius College in Cambridge, where he worked.
For the past forty-five years, Stephen and hundreds of other physicists have struggled to understand the precise nature of a black hole’s randomness. It is a question that keeps on generating new insights about the marriage of quantum theory with general relativity—that is, about the ill-understood laws of quantum gravity.”
― Brief Answers to the Big Questions
For the past forty-five years, Stephen and hundreds of other physicists have struggled to understand the precise nature of a black hole’s randomness. It is a question that keeps on generating new insights about the marriage of quantum theory with general relativity—that is, about the ill-understood laws of quantum gravity.”
― Brief Answers to the Big Questions

“In the one real, time-drenched universe, everything has a particular history precisely because it is finite, and not part of an infinite array. Moreover, the cosmological use of the infinite serves to mask the failure of a physical theory taken beyond the boundaries of its proper domain of application. The most notable instance is the inference in contemporary cosmology of an infinite initial singularity from the field equations of general relativity. Finally, the admission of the mathematical infinite into natural science effaces the difference, which we emphasize, between nature and mathematics. Nature works in time, with which mathematics has trouble. Mathematics offers, among other things, the infinite, which nature abhors.”
―
―