Poldark Saga - Winston Graham discussion
About the Characters
>
Valentine-bound to include SPOILERS
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Tanya, Moderator/Hostess
(last edited Nov 11, 2015 09:21AM)
(new)
Oct 08, 2015 08:05AM
Mod
reply
|
flag
Nature vs. Nuture
Do you think Valentine would have been a different person if his upbringing had been different? Or do you think his personality was due to a genetic predisposition? Or a combination of the two? Since this topic will span most of the series, be sure to mark any comments first with which book and then a SPOILER warning or hidden spoiler.
Do you think Valentine would have been a different person if his upbringing had been different? Or do you think his personality was due to a genetic predisposition? Or a combination of the two? Since this topic will span most of the series, be sure to mark any comments first with which book and then a SPOILER warning or hidden spoiler.
Every time Valentine appears in a scene I end up thinking, "OMG!! Valentine!!" He is so surprising, so intelligent, sarcastic, insightful, bitter, relentlessly honest. Yes, I think if George had completely accepted him and loved him, and if his mother had lived to shower affection on him, that he would have been a completely different person. I think his personality is both nature and nurture, Had he been loved growing up, I think he would have had a softer personality. On the other hand, the wealthy society of the time didn't encourage kindness or compassion, so who knows? Yet, there are scenes in which Valentine does show that he cares about certain people, there is a longing on his part to belong.
Tanya wrote: "I want to talk about Valentine, but I'm a little reluctant because I'm still reading and I don't want spoilers either! "THE BLACK MOON (view spoiler)
Faith wrote: "What does VBT mean? I am in the opinion that Ross did not rape Elizabeth."
VBT = Very Bad Thing. It's a way to mention something without giving a spoiler. It assumes everyone who has read the book knows exactly what you are referring to.
VBT = Very Bad Thing. It's a way to mention something without giving a spoiler. It assumes everyone who has read the book knows exactly what you are referring to.
Mara wrote: "(view spoiler)
I'll have to go back and re-read those bits. I always figured that as smart as Demelza was, she could certainly COUNT!
I'll have to go back and re-read those bits. I always figured that as smart as Demelza was, she could certainly COUNT!
Tanya wrote: "Mara wrote: "[spoilers removed]I'll have to go back and re-read those bits. I always figured that as smart as Demelza was, she could certainly COUNT!"
Demelza does not suffer from illusions. She knows exactly what is going on, but she is infinitely practical and also devoted to Ross. And Ross, in spite of everything, knows instinctively that Demelza is his foundation.
Tanya wrote: "I want to talk about Valentine, ...his birth"In the Black Moon there are also clues that Elizabeth (view spoiler)
More on Valentine's nurture in The Black Moon (infancy and early childhood)-page 418 in my Kindle reading version:
(view spoiler)
(view spoiler)
David wrote: "maybe change the text "know he was hers" to "he was theirs" !"
I've edited my comment to make it clear where I'm quoting from the book and they are not my own words.
I've edited my comment to make it clear where I'm quoting from the book and they are not my own words.



