Tim Zornes

“Most of the liberal defenses of pornography are equally muddled. Writers and university professors feel quite heroic in taking the witness stand to avow that some outrageously immoral book is somehow supremely moral. These men usually display two contradictory motives. First, they oppose the censorship of any book on any grounds as a matter of principle. Anything and everything should be freely published. Some would impose restraints on things that are Nazi, racist, or similarly tabooed, but many are earnest champions of unlimited freedom of publication. Unlimited freedom is for them a supreme good. Second, since unlimited freedom is seen as a supreme good, it follows that the results of such an unlimited freedom must somehow be good. They therefore feel it necessary to defend the moral integrity of such books as are attacked for their use of this license. As a result, these scholars and writers place themselves in a most amusing position: they are ready to defend anything attacked on moral grounds, as though freedom makes all its adherents good. No doubt if some avant-garde writer issued a book empty of everything save a cake of cow dung between its covers, scholars would not be lacking to interpret for a court what a profound and redeeming social commentary was at stake.”
― Rousas John Rushdoony

“Democracy is the theory that the common people know what they want and deserve to get it good and hard.”
― H.L. Mencken, A Little Book In C Major

“Since man must, to play god, hate other men, it means that this pleasure must be a solitary one and must be exacted at the price of someone’s suffering.”
― Rousas John Rushdoony

“The historical manifestations of the covenant of redemption can be categorized according to their specific emphases:
Adam: the covenant of commencement
Noah: the covenant of preservation
Abraham: the covenant of promise
Moses: the covenant of law
David: the covenant of the kingdom
Christ the covenant of consummation.”
― O. Palmer Robertson, The Christ Of The Covenants