to-read
(481)
currently-reading (6)
read (301)
fiction (88)
romance (79)
non-fiction (76)
scandinavian-literature (71)
curriculum (48)
read-these-when-i-was-younger (48)
young-adult-fantasy (42)
audiobook (37)
anthropology (27)
currently-reading (6)
read (301)
fiction (88)
romance (79)
non-fiction (76)
scandinavian-literature (71)
curriculum (48)
read-these-when-i-was-younger (48)
young-adult-fantasy (42)
audiobook (37)
anthropology (27)
children-s-books
(27)
classics (27)
fantasy (26)
young-adult (23)
20th-century (19)
humor (19)
queer (19)
giggling-and-kicking-my-feet (16)
graphic-novels (16)
philosophy (16)
favorites (15)
historical-fiction (15)
classics (27)
fantasy (26)
young-adult (23)
20th-century (19)
humor (19)
queer (19)
giggling-and-kicking-my-feet (16)
graphic-novels (16)
philosophy (16)
favorites (15)
historical-fiction (15)
“Another unary photograph is the pornographic photograph (I am not saying the erotic photograph: the erotic is a pornographic that has been disturbed, fissured). Nothing more homogeneous than a pornographic photograph. It is always a naive photograph, without intention and without calculation. Like a shop window which shows only one illuminated piece of jewelry, it is completely constituted by the presentation of only one thing: sex: no secondary, untimely object ever manages to half conceal, delay, or distract... A proof a contrario: Mapplethorpe shifts his close-ups of genitalia from the pornographic to the erotic by photographing the fabric of underwear at very close range: the photograph is no longer unary, since I am interested in the texture of the material.
The presence (the dynamics) of this blind field is, I believe, what distinguishes the erotic photograph from the pornographic photograph. Pornography ordinarily represents the sexual organs, making them into a motionless object (a fetish), flattered like an idol that does not leave its niche; for me, there is no punctum in the pornographic image; at most it amuses me (and even then, boredom follows quickly). The erotic photograph, on the contrary (and this is its very condition), does not make the sexual organs into a central object; it may very well not show them at all; it takes the spectator outside its frame, and it is there that I animate this photograph and that it animates me.”
― Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography
The presence (the dynamics) of this blind field is, I believe, what distinguishes the erotic photograph from the pornographic photograph. Pornography ordinarily represents the sexual organs, making them into a motionless object (a fetish), flattered like an idol that does not leave its niche; for me, there is no punctum in the pornographic image; at most it amuses me (and even then, boredom follows quickly). The erotic photograph, on the contrary (and this is its very condition), does not make the sexual organs into a central object; it may very well not show them at all; it takes the spectator outside its frame, and it is there that I animate this photograph and that it animates me.”
― Camera Lucida: Reflections on Photography
Amalie’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Amalie’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Amalie
Lists liked by Amalie
































