66 books
—
10 voters
to-read
(2239)
currently-reading (1)
read (156)
non-fiction (916)
history (609)
europe (273)
fiction (270)
communist-history (218)
asia (193)
stalinism (171)
1917-russian-revolution (150)
asia-east (150)
currently-reading (1)
read (156)
non-fiction (916)
history (609)
europe (273)
fiction (270)
communist-history (218)
asia (193)
stalinism (171)
1917-russian-revolution (150)
asia-east (150)
europe-eastern
(143)
europe-western (143)
nationalism (143)
marxism (128)
owned (122)
classics (119)
philosophy (113)
asia-west (99)
biography (92)
imperialism (90)
race (75)
asia-north (72)
europe-western (143)
nationalism (143)
marxism (128)
owned (122)
classics (119)
philosophy (113)
asia-west (99)
biography (92)
imperialism (90)
race (75)
asia-north (72)
“Douglass keenly grasped the plight of the white poor. In their “craftiness,” wrote Douglass, urban slaveholders and shipyard owners forged an “enmity of the poor, laboring white man against the blacks,” forcing an embittered scramble for diminished wages, and rendering the white worker “as much a slave as the black slave himself.” Both were “plundered, and by the same plunderer.” The “white slave” and the “black slave” were both robbed, one by a single master, and the other by the entire slave system. The slaveholding class exploited the lethal tools of racism to convince the burgeoning immigrant poor, said Douglass, that “slavery is the only power that can prevent the laboring white man from falling to the level of the slave’s poverty and degradation.”
― Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom
― Frederick Douglass: Prophet of Freedom
“The concept of the proletariat’s right to command its own class action is only on abstraction devoid of any Marxist sense. It conceals a desire to lead the revolutionary party to enlarge itself by including less mature strata, since as this progressively occurs, the resulting decisions get nearer and nearer to the bourgeois and conservative conceptions.”
― Party and Class
― Party and Class
“Working class bodies (like any other) will only flourish as long as there is a sense of purpose in participating in them. If there is no real discussion, if everything of significance is decided in advance elsewhere, the organ atrophies and the participants vote with their feet. That kind of apathy and passivity is what capitalist society relies upon. Demanding that we put a cross on a piece of paper, to indicate our trust in representatives who can do what they like for five years, is the sole political duty of the “citizen”. Meanwhile the so-called democratic state represents only the interests of the propertied classes. Socialist society is different. It is not just about dispossessing the wealthy of their ownership of the means of production, even if abolishing both the law of value and exploitation are bedrocks on which a new mode of production must arise. Socialism demands the active participation of all producers in the decisions that affect their lives. Its democracy is direct and based on the ability to recall delegates if they do not fulfil the mandate they were given by the collectivity.”
― Russia: Revolution and Counter-Revolution, 1905-1924. A View from the Communist Left
― Russia: Revolution and Counter-Revolution, 1905-1924. A View from the Communist Left
“Derby described the incredible artificial weather that Earthlings sometimes create for other Earthlings when they don’t want those other Earthlings to inhabit Earth any more. Shells were bursting in the treetops with terrific bangs, he said, showering down knives and needles and razorblades. Little lumps of lead in copper jackets were crisscrossing the woods under the shellbursts, zipping along much faster than sound.
A lot of people were being wounded or killed. So it goes.”
― Slaughterhouse-Five
A lot of people were being wounded or killed. So it goes.”
― Slaughterhouse-Five
“A “right of nations” which is valid for all countries and all times is nothing more than a metaphysical cliché of the type of ”rights of man” and “rights of the citizen.” Dialectic materialism, which is the basis of scientific socialism, has broken once and for all with this type of “eternal” formula. For the historical dialectic has shown that there are no “eternal” truths and that there are no “rights.” ... In the words of Engels, “What is good in the here and now, is an evil somewhere else, and vice versa” – or, what is right and reasonable under some circumstances becomes nonsense and absurdity under others. Historical materialism has taught us that the real content of these “eternal” truths, rights, and formulae is determined only by the material social conditions of the environment in a given historical epoch.”
―
―
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 309843 members
— last activity 11 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
Nathan’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Nathan’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Nathan
Lists liked by Nathan




























































