Discover new books on Goodreads
Meet your next favorite book
“We can clearly see that there is no biunivocal correspondence between linear signifying links or archi-writing, depending on the author, and this multireferential, multidimensional machinic catalysis. The symmetry of scale, the transversality, the pathic non-discursive character of their expansion: all these dimensions remove us from the logic of the excluded middle and reinforce us in our dismissal of the ontological binarism we criticised previously. A machinic assemblage, through its diverse components, extracts its consistency by crossing ontological thresholds, non-linear thresholds of irreversibility, ontological and phylogenetic thresholds, creative thresholds of heterogenesis and autopoiesis.”
― Chaosmosis: An Ethicoaesthetic Paradigm
― Chaosmosis: An Ethicoaesthetic Paradigm
“But this pure difference, which constitutes the self-presence of the living present, reintroduces into it originarily all the impurity that we had believed we were able to exclude from it. The living present arises on the basis of its non-self-identity, and on the basis of the retentional trace. It is always already a trace. This trace is unthinkable if we start from the simplicity of a present whose life would be interior to itself. The self of the living present is originarily a trace. The trace is not an attribute about which we could say that the self of the living present "is originarily" the trace. It is necessary to think originary-being from the trace and not the trace from originary-being. This archi-writing is at work in the origin of sense.”
―
―
“To every perspective or point of view there must correspond an autonomous work with its own self-sufficient sense: what matters is the divergence of series, the decentering of circles, 'monstrosity'. The totality of circles and series is thus a formless ungrounded chaos which has no law other than its own repetition, its own reproduction in the development of that which diverges and decenters.”
― Difference and Repetition
― Difference and Repetition
“Although Husserl, above, apparently wanted
to stress the reflective, reproductive, repetitive nature of expression, its Abbilden,
thereby neutralizing, in return, its effects, and its marks, its power to deform
or refract, that is, its Einbilden, now, on the other hand, he stresses an essential
displacement of expression that will forever prevent it from reissuing the stratum
of sense (Sinn): and this difference is nothing less than the difference of the
concept.”
―
to stress the reflective, reproductive, repetitive nature of expression, its Abbilden,
thereby neutralizing, in return, its effects, and its marks, its power to deform
or refract, that is, its Einbilden, now, on the other hand, he stresses an essential
displacement of expression that will forever prevent it from reissuing the stratum
of sense (Sinn): and this difference is nothing less than the difference of the
concept.”
―
“Similarly, not all Life is confined to the organic strata: rather, the organism is that which life sets against itself in order to limit itself, and there is a life all the more intense, all the more powerful for being anorganic. There are also nonhuman Becomings of human beings that overspill the anthropomorphic strata in all directions.”
―
―
Thomas’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Thomas’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Favorite Genres
Philosophy and theory
Polls voted on by Thomas
Lists liked by Thomas















