125 books
—
49 voters
Eric Dowdle
https://www.goodreads.com/edowdle
to-read
(4683)
currently-reading (0)
read (889)
cookbooks (1964)
philosophy (696)
politics (642)
history (597)
economics (489)
currently-reading (0)
read (889)
cookbooks (1964)
philosophy (696)
politics (642)
history (597)
economics (489)
food-writing
(453)
fantasy (310)
sci-fi (276)
sociology-and-anthro (206)
geography-and-nature (129)
theology (119)
fiction (112)
feminism (101)
fantasy (310)
sci-fi (276)
sociology-and-anthro (206)
geography-and-nature (129)
theology (119)
fiction (112)
feminism (101)
“Normally, the easiest way to [use money to get more money, i.e. capitalism] is by establishing some kind of formal or de facto monopoly. For this reason, capitalists, whether merchant princes, financiers, or industrialists, invariably try to ally themselves with political authorities to limit the freedom of the market, so as to make it easier for them to do so. From this perspective, China was for most of its history the ultimate anti-capitalist market state. Unlike later European princes, Chinese rulers systematically refused to team up with would-be Chinese capitalists (who always existed). Instead, like their officials, they saw them as destructive parasites--though, unlike the usurers, ones whose fundamental selfish and antisocial motivations could still be put to use in certain ways. In Confucian terms, merchants were like soldiers. Those drawn to a career in the military were assumed to be driven largely by a love of violence. As individuals, they were not good people, but they were also necessary to defend the frontiers. Similarly, merchants were driven by greed and basically immoral; yet if kept under careful administrative supervision, they could be made to serve the public good. Whatever one might think of the principles, the results are hard to deny. For most of its history, China maintained the highest standard of living in the world--even England only really overtook it in perhaps the 1820s, well past the time of the Industrial Revolution.”
― Debt: The First 5,000 Years
― Debt: The First 5,000 Years
“Generosity is nothing else than a craze to possess. All which I abandon, all which I give, I enjoy in a higher manner through the fact that I give it away. To give is to enjoy possessively the object which one gives. ”
―
―
“Existentialism isn't so atheistic that it wears itself out showing that God doesn't exist. Rather, it declares that even if God did exist, that would change nothing.”
―
―
“For many have but one resource to sustain them in their misery, and that is to think, “Circumstances have been against me, I was worthy to be something much better than I have been. I admit I have never had a great love or a great friendship; but that is because I never met a man or a woman who were worthy of it; if I have not written any very good books, it is because I had not the leisure to do so; or, if I have had no children to whom I could devote myself it is because I did not find the man I could have lived with. So there remains within me a wide range of abilities, inclinations and potentialities, unused but perfectly viable, which endow me with a worthiness that could never be inferred from the mere history of my actions.” But in reality and for the existentialist, there is no love apart from the deeds of love; no potentiality of love other than that which is manifested in loving; there is no genius other than that which is expressed in works of art.”
― Existentialism is a Humanism
― Existentialism is a Humanism
Eric’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Eric’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Eric
Lists liked by Eric













































