Kjǫlsigʀ

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Kjǫlsigʀ.

https://www.goodreads.com/chevalcourant

Old School: Essay...
Kjǫlsigʀ is currently reading
by Ellis Amdur (Goodreads Author)
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (page 102 of 396)
Apr 09, 2026 01:11AM

 
The Roman Way
Kjǫlsigʀ is currently reading
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (page 58 of 224)
Apr 12, 2026 11:45AM

 
With the Old Bree...
Rate this book
Clear rating

progress: 
 
  (page 21 of 325)
Apr 17, 2026 05:04PM

 
See all 56 books that Kjǫlsigʀ is reading…
Loading...
C.G. Jung
“It even seems as if the ego has not been produced by nature to follow its own arbitrary impulses to an unlimited extent, but to help to make real the totality-the whole psyche. It is the ego that serves to light up the entire system, allowing it to become conscious and thus to be realized. If, for example, I have an artistic talent of which my ego is not conscious, nothing will happen to it. The gift may as well be non-existent. Only if my ego notices it can I bring it into reality. The inborn but hidden totality of the psyche is not the same thing as a wholeness that is fully realized and lived.

One could picture this in the following way: The seed of a mountain pine contains the whole future tree in a latent form; but each seed falls at a certain time onto a particular place, in which there are a number of special factors, such as the quality of the soil and the stones, the slope of the land, and its exposure to the sun and wind. The latent totality of the pine in the seed reacts to these cicumstances by avoiding the stones and inclining toward the sun, with the result that the tree's growth is shaped. Thus an individual pine slowly comes into existence, constituting the fulfillment of its totality, its emergence into the realm of reality. Without the living tree, the image of the pine is only a possibility or an abstract idea. Again, the realization of this uniqueness in the individual man is the goal of the process of individuation.”
C.G. Jung, Man and His Symbols

Leon Degrelle
“A country cannot live in disorder, incompetence, irresponsibility, uncertainty, and corruption.”
Leon Degrelle, The Eastern Front: Memoirs of a Waffen SS Volunteer, 1941–1945

Ronald Syme
“Individuals capture attention and engross history, but the most revolutionary changes in Roman politics were the work of families or of a few men.”
Ronald Syme, The Roman Revolution

C.G. Jung
“There are two reasons why man loses contact with the regulating center of his soul. One of them is that some single instinctive drive or emotional image can carry him into a one-sidedness that makes him lose his balance. This also happens to animals; for example, a sexually excited stag will completely forget hunger and security. This one-sidedness and consequent loss of balance are much dreaded by primitives, who call it, "loss of soul." Another threat to the inner balance comes from excessive daydreaming, which in a secret way usually circles around particular complexes. In fact, daydreams arise just because they connect a man with his complexes; at the same time they threaten the concentration and continuity of his consciousness.

The second obstacle is exactly the opposite, and is due to an over-consolidation of ego-consciousness. Although a disciplined consciousness is necessary for the performance of civilized activities (we know what happens if a railway signalman lapses into daydreaming), it has the serious disadvantage that it is apt to block the reception of impulses and messages coming from the center. This is why so many dreams of civilized people are concerned with restoring this receptivity by attempting to correct the attitude of consciousness toward the unconscious center of Self.”
C.G. Jung, Man and His Symbols

Joseph de Maistre
“All sciences have their mysteries and at certain points the apparently most obvious theory will be found in contradiction with experience. Politics, for example, offers several proofs of this truth. In theory, is anything more absurd than hereditary monarchy? We judge it by experience, but if government had never been heard of and we had to choose one, whoever would deliberate between hereditary and elective monarchy would be taken for a fool. Yet we know by experience that the first is, all things considered, the best that can be imagined, while the second is the worst. What arguments could not be amassed to establish that sovereignty comes from the people? However they all amount to nothing. Sovereignty is always taken, never given, and a second more profound theory subsequently discovers why this must be so. Who would not say the best political constitution is that which has been debated and drafted by statesmen perfectly acquainted with the national character, and who have foreseen every circumstance? Nevertheless nothing is more false. The best constituted people is the one that has the fewest written constitutional laws, and every written constitution is WORTHLESS.”
Joseph de Maistre, St Petersburg Dialogues: Or Conversations on the Temporal Government of Providence

year in books
Arthur ...
21,940 books | 186 friends

Brett S...
407 books | 303 friends

TDV
TDV
756 books | 13 friends

Pogo
1,231 books | 516 friends

Heather...
1,071 books | 42 friends

Ms. Koi...
785 books | 15 friends

Bill
1,401 books | 123 friends

Gwendol...
255 books | 668 friends

More friends…



Polls voted on by Kjǫlsigʀ

Lists liked by Kjǫlsigʀ