Yasser Mustafa
is currently reading
progress:
(page 44 of 262)
"حتى أستاذاتالجامعاتفي المدينة يقعن فريسة هذه الأنوثة الموهومة، ترتديالواحدة
منهن في أذنيها قرطًاضخمًا بحجم الكرة الأرضية، وتخفي ملامحها الحقيقية تحت طبقة
فما الفرق بين حجاب من المساحيق « حجاب ما بعد الحداثة » من المكياج مما يُسمى
وحجاب من القماش؟! كلاهما يخفي الوجه الحقيقي للمرأة أو أنوثتها الحقيقية." — Jun 30, 2021 04:43AM
"حتى أستاذاتالجامعاتفي المدينة يقعن فريسة هذه الأنوثة الموهومة، ترتديالواحدة
منهن في أذنيها قرطًاضخمًا بحجم الكرة الأرضية، وتخفي ملامحها الحقيقية تحت طبقة
فما الفرق بين حجاب من المساحيق « حجاب ما بعد الحداثة » من المكياج مما يُسمى
وحجاب من القماش؟! كلاهما يخفي الوجه الحقيقي للمرأة أو أنوثتها الحقيقية." — Jun 30, 2021 04:43AM
“The fundamentalist picks up the book and says, “Okay, I’m just going to read every word of this and do my best to understand what God wants from me. I’ll leave my personal biases completely out of it.” Conversely, every moderate seems to believe that his interpretation and selective reading of scripture is more accurate than God’s literal words. Presumably, God could have written these books any way He wanted. And if He wanted them to be understood in the spirit of twenty-first-century secular rationality, He could have left out all those bits about stoning people to death for adultery or witchcraft. It really isn’t hard to write a book that prohibits sexual slavery—you just put in a few lines like “Don’t take sex slaves!” and “When you fight a war and take prisoners, as you inevitably will, don’t rape any of them!” And yet God couldn’t seem to manage it. This is why the approach of a group like the Islamic State holds a certain intellectual appeal (which, admittedly, sounds strange to say) because the most straightforward reading of scripture suggests that Allah advises jihadists to take sex slaves from among the conquered, decapitate their enemies, and so forth.”
―
―
“When the faithful are asked whether God really exists, they often begin by talking about the enigmatic mysteries of the universe and the limits of human understanding. ‘Science cannot explain the Big Bang,’ they exclaim, ‘so that must be God’s doing.’ Yet like a magician fooling an audience by imperceptibly replacing one card with another, the faithful quickly replace the cosmic mystery with the worldly lawgiver. After giving the name of ‘God’ to the unknown secrets of the cosmos, they then use this to somehow condemn bikinis and divorces. ‘We do not understand the Big Bang – therefore you must cover your hair in public and vote against gay marriage.’ Not only is there no logical connection between the two, but they are in fact contradictory. The deeper the mysteries of the universe, the less likely it is that whatever is responsible for them gives a damn about female dress codes or human sexual behaviour.”
― 21 Lessons for the 21st Century
― 21 Lessons for the 21st Century
“إهداء....
إلي زملاء أبني الصغير أحمد الذين رفضوا حضور عيد ميلاده تصديقاً لأقوال أبائهم عني....إليهم حين يكبرون ويقرأون ويدركون أنني دافعت عنهم وعن مستقبلهم ، وان ما فعلوه كان أقصي عليّ من رصاص جيل أبائهم.”
― نكون أو لا نكون
إلي زملاء أبني الصغير أحمد الذين رفضوا حضور عيد ميلاده تصديقاً لأقوال أبائهم عني....إليهم حين يكبرون ويقرأون ويدركون أنني دافعت عنهم وعن مستقبلهم ، وان ما فعلوه كان أقصي عليّ من رصاص جيل أبائهم.”
― نكون أو لا نكون
“It takes a lot of courage to fight biases and oppressive regimes, but it takes even greater courage to admit ignorance and venture into the unknown. Secular education teaches us that if we don’t know something, we shouldn’t be afraid of acknowledging our ignorance and looking for new evidence. Even if we think we know something, we shouldn’t be afraid of doubting our opinions and checking ourselves again. Many people are afraid of the unknown, and want clear-cut answers for every question. Fear of the unknown can paralyse us more than any tyrant. People throughout history worried that unless we put all our faith in some set of absolute answers, human society will crumble. In fact, modern history has demonstrated that a society of courageous people willing to admit ignorance and raise difficult questions is usually not just more prosperous but also more peaceful than societies in which everyone must unquestioningly accept a single answer. People afraid of losing their truth tend to be more violent than people who are used to looking at the world from several different viewpoints. Questions you cannot answer are usually far better for you than answers you cannot question.”
― 21 Lessons for the 21st Century
― 21 Lessons for the 21st Century
“فليست العلمانية إنكاراً للأديان، وإنما هي إنكار لدور رجال الدين - بصفتهم رجال دين - في إدارة سياسة الدولة أو توجيهها”
― الوفد والمستقبل
― الوفد والمستقبل
Atheists and Skeptics
— 2214 members
— last activity Jan 26, 2026 02:44PM
This is a group meant for the discussion of atheism and skepticism and the books associated with both. Recommending books arguing for or against relig ...more
Yasser’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Yasser’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Yasser
Lists liked by Yasser




























