27 books
—
10 voters
to-read
(1385)
currently-reading (13)
read (736)
enactivist-social-club (94)
jbp-reading-list (85)
phenomenal-books (77)
ethology-animal-minds (73)
evo-devo (67)
next (65)
consciousness (62)
philosophy-of-biology (60)
evopsy (59)
currently-reading (13)
read (736)
enactivist-social-club (94)
jbp-reading-list (85)
phenomenal-books (77)
ethology-animal-minds (73)
evo-devo (67)
next (65)
consciousness (62)
philosophy-of-biology (60)
evopsy (59)
theories-of-content-cogsci
(47)
neurophilosophy-starter-pack (46)
i-m-finally-reading-merleau-ponty (38)
phil-of-science (38)
pragma (38)
andenken (37)
situated-cognition (37)
cogling (35)
history-epistemology-psychoanalysis (35)
language-evolution (35)
enjoying-my-symptom (34)
embodied-communication (33)
neurophilosophy-starter-pack (46)
i-m-finally-reading-merleau-ponty (38)
phil-of-science (38)
pragma (38)
andenken (37)
situated-cognition (37)
cogling (35)
history-epistemology-psychoanalysis (35)
language-evolution (35)
enjoying-my-symptom (34)
embodied-communication (33)


“...Alas, this is simply an illusion. For how can it be possible to relate two or more observational experiences, even if they concern the relations between things that are perceived to be the same or similar, as falsifying (or confirming) each other, rather than merely neutrally record them as one experience here and one experience here, one repetitive of another or not, and leaving it at that (i.e., regarding them as logically incommensurable) unless one presupposed the existence of time-invariantly operating causes? Only if the existence of such time-invariantly operating causes could be assumed would there by any logically compelling reason to regard them as commensurable and as falsifying or confirming each other.
However, Popper, like all empiricists, denies that any such assumption can be given an a priori defense (there are for him no such things as a priori true propositions about reality such as the causality principle would have to be) and is itself merely hypothetical. Yet clearly, if the possibility of constantly operating causes as such is only a hypothetical one, then it can hardly be claimed, as Popper does, that any particular predictive hypothesis could ever be falsified or confirmed. For then the falsification (or confirmation) would have to be considered a hypothetical one: any predictive hypothesis would only under go tests whose status as tests were themselves hypothetical. And hence one would be right back in the muddy midst of skepticism.
Only if the causality principle as such could be unconditionally established as true, could any particular causal hypothesis ever be testable, and the outcome of a test provide rational grounds for deciding whether or not to uphold a given hypothesis.”
― Economic Science and the Austrian Method
However, Popper, like all empiricists, denies that any such assumption can be given an a priori defense (there are for him no such things as a priori true propositions about reality such as the causality principle would have to be) and is itself merely hypothetical. Yet clearly, if the possibility of constantly operating causes as such is only a hypothetical one, then it can hardly be claimed, as Popper does, that any particular predictive hypothesis could ever be falsified or confirmed. For then the falsification (or confirmation) would have to be considered a hypothetical one: any predictive hypothesis would only under go tests whose status as tests were themselves hypothetical. And hence one would be right back in the muddy midst of skepticism.
Only if the causality principle as such could be unconditionally established as true, could any particular causal hypothesis ever be testable, and the outcome of a test provide rational grounds for deciding whether or not to uphold a given hypothesis.”
― Economic Science and the Austrian Method

“Neurotic people often feel as if they are fakes, playing the social game while inwardly despising it, and have a sense of illegitimacy as if they lacked a place in the world. This sense of having a double life creates conflict, yet in as-if cases, there is never a struggle between the "real me" and the social self, as one might expect. It is an identification without conflict. Sometimes, their stiffness and superficiality in social relations may be noticed by other people, and it can give the picture of the commitment-phobe. In fact, the person just knows at some level to stay away from situations that would involve an appeal to the symbolic, those, precisely, where a commitment is involved.”
― What Is Madness?
― What Is Madness?

“The pressure to reduce health care costs is aimed only at the treatment of real diseases. There is no pressure to reduce the costs of treating fictitious diseases. On the contrary, there is pressure to define ever more types of undesirable behaviors as mental disorders or addictions and to spend ever more tax dollars on developing new psychiatric diagnoses and facilities for storing and treating the victims of such diseases, whose members now include alcoholics, drug abusers, smokers, overeaters, self-starvers, gamblers, etc.”
― Cruel Compassion: Psychiatric Control of Society's Unwanted
― Cruel Compassion: Psychiatric Control of Society's Unwanted
“What all of what was then to be understood to be being presumed so makes something now recognizable as to what we were, in fact, then speaking of in speaking of ‘whales’.”
―
―

“Je suis à la place d'où se vocifèe que "l'univers est un défaut dans la pureté du Non-Être". Et ceci non pas sans raison, car à se garder, cette place fait languir l'Être lui-même. Elle s'appelle la Jouissance, et c'est elle dont le défaut rendrait vain l'univers. En ai-je donc la charge? -- Oui sans doute. Cette jouissance dont le manque fait l'Autre inconsistant, est-elle donc la mienne? L'expérience prouve qu'elle m'est ordinairement interdite, et ceci non pas seulement, comme le croiraient les imbéciles, par un mauvais arrangement de la société, mais je dirais par la faute de l'Autre s'il existait: l'Autre n'existant pas, il ne me reste qu'à prendre la faute sur Je, c'est-à-dire à croire à ce à quoi l'expérience nous conduit tous, Freud en tête: au péché originel.”
― Écrits
― Écrits
Larry’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at Larry’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Polls voted on by Larry
Lists liked by Larry