progress:
(page 127 of 188)
"NB: started reading about a month or so ago
Carroll’s introduction of Habermas around page 120 is rubbish. He introduces Habermas’ critique, which as it turns out by a footnote a few pages over is largely a misreading of Nietzsche’s actual work. Perhaps a self report: I care not for anything Habermas has to say. I want Stirner and Nietzsche and direct relevance to the same." — 22 hours, 27 min ago
"NB: started reading about a month or so ago
Carroll’s introduction of Habermas around page 120 is rubbish. He introduces Habermas’ critique, which as it turns out by a footnote a few pages over is largely a misreading of Nietzsche’s actual work. Perhaps a self report: I care not for anything Habermas has to say. I want Stirner and Nietzsche and direct relevance to the same." — 22 hours, 27 min ago
Political Philosophy and Ethics
— 6156 members
— last activity Dec 24, 2025 01:11PM
Study and discussion of the important questions of ethical and political philosophy from Confucius and Socrates to the present. Rules (see also the ...more
Mitchell’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Mitchell’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
Favorite Genres
Classics and Philosophy
Polls voted on by Mitchell
Lists liked by Mitchell






























