Status Updates From وهم الإله

I agree with Dawkins' points but I deplore his insidious sloppiness in the exposure of the arguments, such as when he argues for why religion might be a by-product of natural predispositions, and stops at that, with an eyebrow raised for all his followers who need not ask the more interesting question of how likely religion actually is mere by-product, "the equivalent of the moth's light-compass reaction".