Status Updates From In the Long Run We Are All ...

i am getting through this SO SLOW it’s incredibly dense (hardest book i’ve ever read for sure) but SO FASCINATING

quite intrigued by the author comparing hegelian and keynesian thought, the idea i can’t get out of my head is their common fear of revolution & anxiety around human nature leading them both to believe in a strong, involved state

keynes may be a bourgeois bastard but he’s our bourgeois bastard

hegel actually was a keynesian all along

"[w]e reach a condition where there is no shortage of houses, but where nevertheless no one can afford to live in the houses that there are”—in other words, an “excess of riches” cannot prevent an “excess of poverty.” sounds prescient, capitalism is constant.

do we embrace a kind of revolutionary faith in the incontrovertible truth of the will of “the people,” or do we work with the notion...that only those recognized as having an adequate stake in society can be trusted to construct and maintain it? That liberals have opted for the latter since the very birth of liberalism in the revolutionary era is one of the illiberal truths of liberalism

"Since liberal capitalism cannot and will not hold itself responsible for poverty—which is, on its terms, a condition insufficiently or not yet liberal and capitalist—then poverty is always the fault of the poor. There is nowhere, systemically or geographically, the poor are “supposed” to be"