Status Updates From Moon Man: The True Story of...

So far this book has been about 50% ranting, 50% interesting story about Sibrel’s work to bring his reel of footage to light. During the ranting portion, Sibrel can be found using a lot of “!” and repeating the same idea over & over again. Add in a couple side-rants (911 inside job) too. Also, I don’t want to watch a 50-minute YouTube link. Overall, the evidence Sibrel is trying to show is not digestible.

The number of metaphors in a single page, how we are sheep or a diseased body, is becoming irksome. Let the facts speak for themselves. I thought this book what about the faked moon landing? Up to this point, the book is nothing but complete rant. The only informative piece was from a link to a 40-min youtube video debunking the landing…

The author is failing to convince me of the terrible-ness of the scripted moon-landing. Though I am open to being convinced, even if it is faked, does it matter? The tone of the author’s anger at the government comes across over-bearing and pulls away credibility, with wording such as “heartless overloads”. I prefer to be led with facts to start before introducing opinion-based logic later on.

This thing is SO HARD to put down and utterly shocking with every page.