Corey’s Reviews > Quirkology: How We Discover the Big Truths in Small Things > Status Update
Corey
is on page 33 of 339
Im sorry you just
Ignored
That June didn't support your data?? You can't just ignore data that's inconvenient to your study!
— Sep 16, 2025 03:08PM
Ignored
That June didn't support your data?? You can't just ignore data that's inconvenient to your study!
Like flag
Corey’s Previous Updates
Corey
is on page 45 of 339
Love that he fully admitted these studies can't be replicated and was like "but maybe they're true!"
— Oct 24, 2025 07:56AM
Corey
is on page 33 of 339
Yeah man I'm gonna need you to repeat this is several other locations and get similar results otherwise this is basically just an anecdote
— Sep 16, 2025 03:09PM
Corey
is on page 32 of 339
Why is he calling this a large scale public experiment when what it actually is is a large scale voluntary response survey given at a fair
— Sep 16, 2025 03:07PM
Corey
is on page 32 of 339
So voluntary response surveys aren't great in terms of the results they give you which tend to be highly biased
— Sep 16, 2025 03:06PM
Corey
is on page 28 of 339
If you're going to cite a study and say that it's controversial tell me why it's controversial and why you feel it's worth citing anyway
— Sep 05, 2025 06:35PM
Corey
is on page 28 of 339
Hey you can't tell me a study is controversial and not tell me why
— Sep 05, 2025 06:34PM
Corey
is on page 23 of 339
So idk who needs to hear this but a professor doing a non-sanctioned "study" on his college class is not a scientifically valid study and is instead just some guy fucking with his students
Which is fine just don't pretend it's a scientifically valid experiment
— Aug 27, 2025 06:41PM
Which is fine just don't pretend it's a scientifically valid experiment
Corey
is on page 11 of 339
It's weird how everything cited here is a new outlet and not like a journal almost like his 3 person stock market experiment has 0 scientific validity or something
— Jul 20, 2025 01:04PM
Corey
is on page 9 of 339
"The experiment involved 3 participants"
So it has no statistical significance and proves basically nothing lmao
— Jul 20, 2025 12:50PM
So it has no statistical significance and proves basically nothing lmao

