Kaitlyn’s Reviews > How to Tame a Fox (and Build a Dog): Visionary Scientists and a Siberian Tale of Jump-Started Evolution > Status Update
Kaitlyn
is 22% done
Sigh. Here we go.
No, Pavlov did not 'shape' behavior. Shaping is for operant, not respondent, behavior.
No, the science is not 'behaviorism.' Behaviorism is a category of many, many different philosophies (e.g., radical, teleological, methodological). The science is Behavior Modification or Behavior Analysis (dependant on time period).
— Oct 26, 2025 06:41AM
No, Pavlov did not 'shape' behavior. Shaping is for operant, not respondent, behavior.
No, the science is not 'behaviorism.' Behaviorism is a category of many, many different philosophies (e.g., radical, teleological, methodological). The science is Behavior Modification or Behavior Analysis (dependant on time period).
Like flag
Kaitlyn’s Previous Updates
Kaitlyn
is 33% done
No, Skinner would have acknowledged the phylogenic component of tail wagging, because he acknowledged the interaction of conditioning and biology from the get-go.
— Oct 26, 2025 09:41AM
Kaitlyn
is 25% done
Well, 'dismissed animal emotions' is an over-generalization. Even the methodological folks admitted to private events, they just wanted to avoid their study out of a fear of mentalism. There's a difference between refusing to acknowledge emotions existing, and seeing emotions as behaviors to explain rather than explanations for behavior.
— Oct 26, 2025 06:47AM
Kaitlyn
is 24% done
So his point was based on the anthropomorphization of his dog. :-/
— Oct 26, 2025 06:45AM
Kaitlyn
is 23% done
"Animals can do elementary reasoning, behaviors not controlled by genetics or conditioning" - This only makes sense if you think Pavlovian conditioning is the only form. Operant conditioning is the process by which we learn to reason; reasoning IS behavior. The authors seem to feel that Pavlov and Skinner were devout blank slaters, which was *never* the case.
— Oct 26, 2025 06:43AM

