Bobby Underwood’s Reviews > Dark City Dames: The Women Who Defined Film Noir > Status Update

Bobby Underwood
Bobby Underwood is on page 41 of 288
I'm guessing on pages, since I'm skipping around. Reading the Evelyn Keyes section. Lovely, but can't say I'm terribly fond of her or a lot of the other Hollywood types in her orbit. Liked Jane Greer far more.
Dec 20, 2025 04:36PM
Dark City Dames: The Women Who Defined Film Noir

10 likes ·  flag

Bobby’s Previous Updates

Bobby Underwood
Bobby Underwood is on page 27 of 288
Dec 11, 2025 02:02PM
Dark City Dames: The Women Who Defined Film Noir


Comments Showing 1-4 of 4 (4 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

Jill H. But what about the fantastic Marie Windsor? She was the Queen.


message 2: by Bobby (last edited Dec 21, 2025 08:19PM) (new) - added it

Bobby Underwood Jill H. wrote: "But what about the fantastic Marie Windsor? She was the Queen."

I'm still on Evelyn Keyes at the moment. Going slow with the holidays. I'm reading their first section, then the second part, reflections once they're older. Though I did take a gander at the sections on Gail Russell and Ella Raines, in the new additions to this edition. Couldn't resist. Regretful that due to the perimeters he set out in the first edition, having them be around and willing to be interviewed especially, that so many were left out. Many still are, at least in this book. Muller is slightly getting on my nerves as he falls all over himself to tow the PC feminist line, while absolving all the women he interviews and likes of their behavior, never commenting on that, but mostly this is really good so far.


Jill H. Evelyn Keyes' private life read life a bad soap opera! You made a good point re: Muller's PC feminist line. Happy reading, Bobby.


message 4: by Bobby (new) - added it

Bobby Underwood Jill H. wrote: "Evelyn Keyes' private life read life a bad soap opera! You made a good point re: Muller's PC feminist line. Happy reading, Bobby."

Yes, a bit soapy and tawdry. Nowhere near Barbara Payton's zip code, but a bit unseemly nonetheless. LOL


back to top