Mitchell Chatfield’s Reviews > Break-out from the Crystal Palace;: The anarcho-psychological critique; Stirner, Nietzsche, Dostoevsky > Status Update
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 127 of 188
NB: started reading about a month or so ago
Carroll’s introduction of Habermas around page 120 is rubbish. He introduces Habermas’ critique, which as it turns out by a footnote a few pages over is largely a misreading of Nietzsche’s actual work. Perhaps a self report: I care not for anything Habermas has to say. I want Stirner and Nietzsche and direct relevance to the same.
— Dec 25, 2025 01:36PM
Carroll’s introduction of Habermas around page 120 is rubbish. He introduces Habermas’ critique, which as it turns out by a footnote a few pages over is largely a misreading of Nietzsche’s actual work. Perhaps a self report: I care not for anything Habermas has to say. I want Stirner and Nietzsche and direct relevance to the same.
Like flag
