Corey’s Reviews > You Just Don't Understand: Women and Men in Conversation > Status Update
Corey
is on page 208 of 342
You can't say "as a linguist and researcher" to explain your deliberate decision to ignore extremely well documented and validated repeatable studies just because they make your thesis fall apart Deborah
— Dec 31, 2025 08:32AM
Like flag
Corey’s Previous Updates
Corey
is on page 297 of 342
I think this book would piss me off less if Deborah just said "conversational style" or "communication style" and named those instead of saying dumb bullshit like "genderlect" and making overbroad encompassing statements based on fiction poetry and anecdotes involving a small handful of people
— Jan 10, 2026 10:52AM
Corey
is on page 286 of 342
Mom come get me she's citing poetry and refusing to acknowledge the existence of systemic misogyny again
— Jan 10, 2026 07:15AM
Corey
is on page 251 of 342
Deborah loves to point at anecdotal evidence that is barely sufficient to be anecdotal and then extrapolate wild conclusions from that
Which isn't scientifically valid
— Jan 05, 2026 03:18PM
Which isn't scientifically valid
Corey
is on page 241 of 342
"If I wrote, “After delivering the acceptance speech, the candidate fainted,” you would know I was talking about a woman. Men do not faint; they pass out."
Deborah what the FUCK are you talking about
— Jan 05, 2026 11:36AM
Deborah what the FUCK are you talking about
Corey
is on page 210 of 342
The problem is that Deborah seems to think oppression is about feelings when it's actually about material conditions
— Dec 31, 2025 08:38AM
Corey
is on page 208 of 342
She's now saying that we should ignore the power dynamics at play because she finds them inconvenient to her stupid bullshit thesis
— Dec 31, 2025 08:28AM
Corey
is on page 202 of 342
I'm gonna be so real man, I don't give a shit about who Nancy Reagan disliked or why
— Dec 31, 2025 08:24AM

