Noel’s Reviews > Essays and Aphorisms > Status Update
1 like · Like flag
Noel’s Previous Updates
Noel
is on page 165 of 240
“A novel will be the higher and nobler the more inner and less outer life it depicts; and this relation will accompany every grade of novel as its characteristic sign, from Tristram Shandy down to the crudest and most action-packed romance. Tristram Shandy, to be sure, has as good as no action whatever; but how very little action there is in La Nouvelle Héloise and…”
[…]
— May 03, 2026 10:09PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 160 of 240
“The reason the impressions we receive in youth are so significant, the reason why in the dawn of life everything appears to us in so ideal and transfigured a light, is that when we then first become acquainted with the genus, which is still new to us, through the individual, so that every individual thing stands as a representative of its genus: we grasp therein the (Platonic) Idea of this genus,”
[…]
— May 03, 2026 09:47PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 160 of 240
“…waxwork figures make no aesthetic impression and are consequently not works of art (in the aesthetic sense), although when they are well made they produce a far greater illusion of reality than the best picture or statue can and if imitation of the actual were the aim of art would have to be accorded the first rank. For they seem to present not the pure form but with it the material as well,”
[…]
— May 03, 2026 09:44PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 88 of 240
I can’t get over how illogical Schopenhauer’s argument for polygamy is in his diatribe “On Women.” It’s like he completely forgets that men and women are roughly equal in number. If a man takes two wives, that leaves one man without any. If a man takes fifty wives, forty-nine other men have to do without. Given wealth disparities, polygamy inevitably means that poor men will go without wives and…
[…]
— Apr 23, 2026 09:39PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 61 of 240
I couldn’t decide which quotes I wanted to post. I’m just going to put the best ones here. (I can’t help grinning reading Schopenhauer.)
[…]
— Apr 21, 2026 05:14PM
[…]
Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Noel
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 03, 2026 09:04PM
“The monarchical form of government is the form most natural to man. How could it possibly happen that, universally and at all times, many millions, even hundreds of millions, of us men have subjected ourselves to and willingly obeyed one man, occasionally even a woman or, provisionally, a child, if there were not in man a monarchical instinct which drives him to it as to the condition most appropriate to him? … Republics are anti-natural, artificial, and derive from reflection: consequently there are also very few of them in the entire history of mankind…”
reply
|
flag
Schopenhauer builds this argument over several sections but most decisive is that:“A constitution embodying nothing but abstract justice would be a wonderful thing, but it would not be suited to beings such as men. Because the great majority of men are in the highest degree egoistic, unjust, inconsiderate, deceitful, sometimes even malicious, and equipped moreover with very mediocre intelligence, there exists the need for a completely unaccountable power, concentrated in one man and standing above even justice and the law, before which everything bows and which is regarded as a being of a higher order, a sovereign by the grace of God. Only thus can mankind in the long run be curbed and ruled.”

