Noel’s Reviews > Essays and Aphorisms > Status Update
Noel
is on page 165 of 240
“A novel will be the higher and nobler the more inner and less outer life it depicts; and this relation will accompany every grade of novel as its characteristic sign, from Tristram Shandy down to the crudest and most action-packed romance. Tristram Shandy, to be sure, has as good as no action whatever; but how very little action there is in La Nouvelle Héloise and…”
[…]
— May 03, 2026 10:09PM
[…]
22 likes · Like flag
Noel’s Previous Updates
Noel
is on page 160 of 240
“The reason the impressions we receive in youth are so significant, the reason why in the dawn of life everything appears to us in so ideal and transfigured a light, is that when we then first become acquainted with the genus, which is still new to us, through the individual, so that every individual thing stands as a representative of its genus: we grasp therein the (Platonic) Idea of this genus,”
[…]
— May 03, 2026 09:47PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 160 of 240
“…waxwork figures make no aesthetic impression and are consequently not works of art (in the aesthetic sense), although when they are well made they produce a far greater illusion of reality than the best picture or statue can and if imitation of the actual were the aim of art would have to be accorded the first rank. For they seem to present not the pure form but with it the material as well,”
[…]
— May 03, 2026 09:44PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 88 of 240
I can’t get over how illogical Schopenhauer’s argument for polygamy is in his diatribe “On Women.” It’s like he completely forgets that men and women are roughly equal in number. If a man takes two wives, that leaves one man without any. If a man takes fifty wives, forty-nine other men have to do without. Given wealth disparities, polygamy inevitably means that poor men will go without wives and…
[…]
— Apr 23, 2026 09:39PM
[…]
Noel
is on page 61 of 240
I couldn’t decide which quotes I wanted to post. I’m just going to put the best ones here. (I can’t help grinning reading Schopenhauer.)
[…]
— Apr 21, 2026 05:14PM
[…]
Comments Showing 1-11 of 11 (11 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Noel
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
May 03, 2026 10:09PM
“…Wilhelm Meister! Even Don Quixote has relatively little, and what there is is very trivial, amounting to no more than a series of jokes. And these four novels are the crown of the genre. Consider, further, the marvellous novels of Jean Paul and see how much inner life is set in motion on the narrowest of external foundations. Even the novels of Walter Scott have a significant preponderance of inner over outer life, and the latter appears only with a view to setting the former in motion; while in bad novels the outer action is there for its own sake. The art lies in setting the inner life into the most violent motion with the smallest possible expenditure of outer life: for it is the inner life which is the real object of our interest. – The task of the novelist is not to narrate great events but to make small ones interesting.”
reply
|
flag
I really enjoy Schopenhauer’s views on aesthetics. This would have been good to read before The Birth of Tragedy, since Nietzsche breaks with Schopenhauer on a number of counts. What struck me the most was that, while Nietzsche declares the text of a music drama as a necessary complement to the music and a protective veil for its overwhelming power, Schopenhauer derides the text as a distraction, arguing that music—the highest music—demands the undivided attention of the mind. In fact, Schopenhauer doesn’t have a high opinion of opera at all especially, describing it as a “barbaric conception”:“Strictly speaking one could call opera an unmusical invention for the benefit of unmusical minds, in as much as music first has to be smuggled in through a medium foreign to it, for instance as the accompaniment to a long drawn out, insipid love story and its poetic pap: for a spirited compact poem full of matter is of no use as an opera text, because the composition cannot be equal to such a poem.”
Nietzsche's dominant musical reference point was Wagner, who was influenced by Schopenhauer and was trying to create a total work of art rather than music as an abstraction. Whereas Schopenhauer's main reference weirdly seems to have been Rossini, although it's not as if German Romantic operas like Fidelio or Der Freischutz weren't available to him.
Thanks for clearing that up, Richard. Could you explain what you mean by music as an abstraction? (As opposed to a total work of art.)
Absolute music might be a better way to put it, as that was the term Wagner coined for the purpose i.e. music that lacks explicit conceptual content but which was able to transcend to a higher, more spiritual realm, because of that absence. It meant an appeal to the emotions rather than to reason, although Wagner wanted to create a synthesis of the two, hence the idea of uniting lyrics, staging, dance and music to a common end.
I like the interrogation brought up by Schopenhauer on this! Thanks for sharing it, Noel. This is a topic that resurfaced for me recently, as I was bound to compare the writing style of Michaël Dichter in his first novel "On l'appelait Bennie Diamond", in which his main profession of director and screenwriter shows vividly: the action is nearly always shown from an exterior point of view, contrasting sharply with William Johnston's English translation of "Silence" by Shusaku Endo, much more concerned with displaying the inner state of the characters, through the use of letters notably!
Thanks, PE :) Tbh I’m not sure I can agree entirely with Schopenhauer’s assessment. I did think this passage was kind of funny, since the works he mentions are pre-realist/modernist and certainly pale in this respect to Flaubert -> Tolstoy/Dostoevsky -> Proust/Joyce/Woolf/Faulkner. It’s as if there’s been a general tendency of “great” Western literature to become more inward, which I guess would make Schopenhauer happy.
I'm not sure either, and he does seem to tip the scales somewhat now that you mention it! ;) Still, it's good food for thought! :)
I often catch myself musing about the specificity of the novel as an art form compared to the visual arts, in particular! :) Does that strange habit inhabit you too? ;)

