Andrew Meredith’s Reviews > The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God > Status Update

Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 149 of 456
The Situational Justification of Knowledge
May 08, 2026 12:17PM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)

1 like ·  flag

Andrew’s Previous Updates

Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 301 of 456
Logic as a tool of theology.
May 22, 2026 01:32PM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 241 of 456
Frame discusses language as a tool for theology and related subtopics.
May 20, 2026 11:33AM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 214 of 456
Scripture as painting, Scripture as window, and Scripture as mirror.
May 15, 2026 01:50PM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 168 of 456
The Existential Justification of Knowledge
May 11, 2026 11:54AM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 139 of 456
The Normative Justification of Knowledge

"Rationalism recognizes a need for criteria, or standards; empiricism a need for objective, publicly knowable facts; and subjectivism a need for our beliefs to meet our own internal criteria. A Christian epistemology will recognize all of those concerns but will differ from the rationalist, empiricist, and subjectivist schools of thought in important ways."
May 06, 2026 12:14PM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 122 of 456
Frame critiques rationalism, empiricism, and subjectivism, which are idolatries of the mind, the world, and the self, respectively.

Subjectivism does not work because one must believe in some kind of objective truth to function in life, including teaching subjectivism itself. The other two "objective" tendencies inevitably fall into hopeless subjectivism when trying to bridge the gap between "the one and the many."
May 05, 2026 10:27AM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 102 of 456
"In making ethical decisions, we meet again the factors we have been discussing-the law, the situation, the self. Every ethical decision involves the application of a law (norm, principle) to a situation by a person (self)."
May 04, 2026 01:40PM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Andrew Meredith
Andrew Meredith is on page 61 of 456
"The non-Christian, of course, can accept an absolute only if that absolute is impersonal and therefore makes no demands and has no power to bless or curse. There are personal gods in paganism, but none of them is absolute; there are absolutes in paganism, but none is personal. Only in Christianity (and in other religions influenced by the Bible) is there such a concept as a "personal absolute.""
Apr 29, 2026 01:39PM
The Doctrine of the Knowledge of God (A Theology of Lordship)


Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Andrew (new) - added it

Andrew Meredith "Under the normative perspective, I argued that all facts are normative, so that the normative perspective embraces all reality.' It is also evident that all norms are facts: it is a fact that God has spoken to us. Thus the normative and situational perspectives are coextensive. Beliefs justified by Scripture will be the same beliefs as those justified by the facts. Scripture demands that we believe the truth, the facts--nothing more nor less. Thus there are no "brute facts,' facts that are devoid of interpretation. All facts are what they are by virtue of God's interpretation of them. And just as facts are inseparable from God's interpretation of them, so our un- derstanding of facts is inseparable from our interpretation of them. Stating a fact and interpreting it are the same activity. Facts themselves are law-laden. They convey to us God's existence and His will for us (Rom. 1:20, 32)."

We should utilize apologetic arguments in defense of the Christian faith, followed by a call for our hearers to repent and believe. For although arguments cannot produce faith, they do both justify and warrant it.


back to top