Andrew Meredith’s Reviews > Delivered from the Elements of the World: Atonement, Justification, Mission > Status Update
1 like · Like flag
Andrew’s Previous Updates
Andrew Meredith
is on page 42 of 368
Chapter 2: The Physics of the Old Creation
— May 26, 2026 12:19PM
Andrew Meredith
is on page 239 of 368
In Chapter 7, Leithart (1) enters the pistis Christou debate on the side of subjective genitive, (2) enters the penal substitutionary debate on the affirmative side, and then (3) skillfully and imo convincingly brings the two together.
Jesus, the faithful High King (David’s greater Son) is the penal substitution for Israel, taking the wrath she deserves as her one-flesh Husband. His faithfulness unto death saves us.
— Aug 24, 2025 07:50AM
Jesus, the faithful High King (David’s greater Son) is the penal substitution for Israel, taking the wrath she deserves as her one-flesh Husband. His faithfulness unto death saves us.
Andrew Meredith
is on page 150 of 368
Leithart provides in chapter 4 one of the most useful systematic treatments on the biblical understanding of "flesh" I have ever encountered.
Too briefly put, "flesh" is (now) godless mortality driven by the fear of death into protectiveness, segregation, violence, and virility to both guard and extend itself.
Thus illuminating circumcision: the removal of flesh by the deliberate cutting of its most potent symbol.
— Aug 22, 2025 05:55AM
Too briefly put, "flesh" is (now) godless mortality driven by the fear of death into protectiveness, segregation, violence, and virility to both guard and extend itself.
Thus illuminating circumcision: the removal of flesh by the deliberate cutting of its most potent symbol.
Andrew Meredith
is on page 85 of 368
A successful theory of the atonement:
1. Historically plausible: a meaningful interpretation of all events
2. Inevitable: end of an obvious trajectory with strong explanatory power for what came before
3. Levitical: fulfillment of ritual, especially sacrifice
4. Evangelical: arises from within Gospels
5. Epistolary: makes sense of words, sentences, arguments in Apostles' letters
6. Fruitful: leads to church history
— Aug 20, 2025 06:39AM
1. Historically plausible: a meaningful interpretation of all events
2. Inevitable: end of an obvious trajectory with strong explanatory power for what came before
3. Levitical: fulfillment of ritual, especially sacrifice
4. Evangelical: arises from within Gospels
5. Epistolary: makes sense of words, sentences, arguments in Apostles' letters
6. Fruitful: leads to church history
Andrew Meredith
is on page 70 of 368
"The common contemporary rhetoric of conflicts between religion and politics obscures the reality. Conflicts are never between politics and religion. Conflicts are always between rivals that are both religious and both political."
— Aug 19, 2025 03:03PM
Andrew Meredith
is on page 35 of 368
"Justification," being declared/proven right, must be placed within the ongoing war between the seed of the woman and the seed of the serpent, on which depends the destiny of the cosmos over which mankind has been placed.
Jesus and all who are "in Him" were justified by His resurrection, and with it, a cosmological regeneration began in which the curse of death and the power of Satan is being turned back day by day.
— Aug 19, 2025 05:59AM
Jesus and all who are "in Him" were justified by His resurrection, and with it, a cosmological regeneration began in which the curse of death and the power of Satan is being turned back day by day.



"Torah was given to Israel outside Eden, after Babel, and it accepted the conditions of Edenic and Babelic curse. Torah did not restore open access to the garden. Torah did not get the cherubim to lay down their fiery swords. Torah did not reunite the nations in one flesh or make them all one flesh with God. Simply by the fact of its being given to Israel and not to everyone, Torah established a hierarchy of access and responsibility to God and his oracles. Torah was accommodated to the fleshly condition of the human race. It was a new, divine version of ta stoicheia tou kosmou, adding elements to the world that circumcision began to form. By revealing Torah, Yahweh continued the process of creating a new type of human being, modifying human nature Jewishly, Torahly. What is born of flesh is flesh, and sons of Abraham continued to be born of flesh. Eight days later, their flesh was cut away and they were reborn as Jews physei. Israel was not a child of the Spirit, but it was no longer precisely ek tes sarkos either. Israelites and Israelite society became naturally Jewish by taking their origin from Torah: their world was the social formation that emerged ek nomou (see Rom 4:16) or ek tõn ergon nomou. It was a cultural and religious world constituted by Jewish elements. This formation of a Jewish physis was the first stage in the Creator's renewal of human physis."
"The intention behind the Tabernacle is frequently misunderstood. Israel's holy places were restricted spaces, off-limits to all but authorized personnel, priests who had "filled the hand," been consecrated and wore their robes of glory and beauty that made them at home in Yahweh's glory house (Ex 28-29; Lev 8-9). But the building of the tabernacle and later the temple did not create the conditions of exclusion and distance. In fact, the sanctuary was a countermovement to the curse of Eden. Yahweh drove Adam and Eve out of the garden; he invited Aaron and his sons in. For the first time since Eden, a human being stood before the Creator to serve. Not Noah, not Abraham, not Jacob or Joseph: none of them passed by the cherubim to take up the Adamic task to stand and serve within Yahweh's garden. For the first time since Yahweh stationed cherubim at the gate of the garden, Torah allowed human beings to take over the Adamic task to "guard" the garden ( šamar, Gen 2:15). For the first time since Adam, holy men walked on holy ground, with only a veil embroidered with cherubim between them and Yahweh. The tabernacle was still holy space, but the boundaries of holy space had become porous. Yahweh expelled Adam from the garden in wrath, and put Adam under wrath. In the tabernacle system, Yahweh went out into the howling waste to find his unfaithful bride and bring her back home. He went outside Eden to give a taste of Eden to Adam's children who lived east of Eden."
"The prohibitions of Torah are imposed for thr sake of access. The No to impurity is ordered to the Yes of welcome. Yahweh did not descend from Sinai to the ark asking, "What fences can I set up that will keep my neighbors from disturbing my peace!" He came saying, "You can draw near, but only under certain conditions, only in a state that makes it safe for you to approach." The accent in the rules of impurity is not on the exclusion, which is presupposed. The texts focus on the details of purity, but the telos of these regulations is to describe mechanisms for removal of impurity, which means the closure of distance. Usually that closure of distance involves a simple washing. Sometimes it includes more elaborate rites of purification that include sacrifice. In either case, the purity rules do not exclude Israel permanently but allow Israel to draw near."
"How did Torah express Israel's separation from separation, her negation of the politics of flesh? In part it achieved that by giving Israel access to Yahweh, the Creator of Israel and the nations. Yahweh's life, blessing and gifts were available in the sanctuary, and he drew near to Israel to distribute those gifts, not only to Israel but also through them to the world. He gave his oracles to Israel so that Israel may become a light to the nations and a teacher of the wise. While Israel alone was the priestly people, the caretaker of Yahweh's house, Israel cared for the house on behalf of the nations. At the Feast of Booths, she offered seventy bulls for the seventy nations, and so offered up the world to the Creator. When Solomon dedicated the temple, he asked Yahweh to hear the prayers of strangers as well as of Israelites, making the temple a house of prayer for the nations (1 Kings 8). Based on Numbers 15, it seems likely that Gentiles could offer sacrifice at the Lord's house. It is arguable that Israel bore the sins of the nations for the nations. As we will see below, the sanctuary and priest bore Israel's sins, and it seems fitting that Israel, as the priestly nation, also bore the sins of the nations."