Laurie’s Reviews > What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution > Status Update

Laurie
Laurie is on page 253 of 328
Making lesbians and gay men more legally visible will neither solve nor complicate anyone else’s daily commitments. And yet it will insist on something that is quite unnerving to acknowledge: that we must each pay rigorous attention to-and believe in-each individual spirit.
Jun 20, 2026 07:00AM
What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution

flag

Laurie’s Previous Updates

Laurie
Laurie is on page 159 of 328
Restricting marriage to husband/wife pairs is an essential symbol of male supremacy-just as restricting marriage to one race was an essential symbol of white supremacy.
Jun 19, 2026 06:31AM
What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution


Laurie
Laurie is on page 121 of 328
But if an affectionate father helps, and a nasty or distant father hurts, then researchers still haven’t discovered something essentially male that a child needs: they’ve simply discovered that children do better with closeness and reliability than with ridicule and rejection.
Jun 19, 2026 04:36AM
What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution


Laurie
Laurie is on page 77 of 328
In 1930, Pope Pius XI issued his encyclical Casti Conubii (Of Chaste Marriage), which endorsed the old refraining/reproducing ideal by intoning that contraception “violates the law of God and nature,” and grew out of women’s “false liberty and unnatural equality” - a clear recognition that contraception and female emancipation went hand in hand.
Jun 18, 2026 03:10PM
What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution


Laurie
Laurie is on page 54 of 328
Jun 18, 2026 09:23AM
What Is Marriage For?: The Strange Social History of Our Most Intimate Institution


No comments have been added yet.