M’s Reviews > Is a River Alive? > Status Update
M
is on page 82 of 384
"It seems clear to me then...that to say a river is alive is not an anthropomorphic claim. A river is not a human person, nor vice versa. Each withholds from the other in different ways. To call a river alive is not to personify a river, but instead further to deepen and widen the category of 'life,' and in doing so...'enlarge the imagined range for self to move in.'"
— 8 hours, 31 min ago
Like flag
M’s Previous Updates
M
is on page 41 of 384
" 'If fungi were to speak,' says Giuliana, 'they would tell us what they show us, which is that really death of an organism is the beginning of countless others; that there is no end to life, just a constantly shifting substrate.' "
— Jun 20, 2026 10:18AM
