Patrick’s Reviews > A Frolic of His Own > Status Update

Patrick
Patrick is on page 222 of 512
“-I suppose that's exactly why she has two sets. I mean this way she probably counts on winning one or the other after the lesson she learned losing that dreadful custody battle over TJ, she's still livid about it.
-But she won didn't she? Doesn't the boy live with her?
-That was the problem Harry. Neither of them wanted him…”
Aug 10, 2026 09:42AM
A Frolic of His Own

3 likes ·  flag

Patrick’s Previous Updates

Patrick
Patrick is on page 374 of 512
3 hours, 29 min ago
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 352 of 512
“—Like an office worker puts out an eye shooting paperclips with a rubberband they say he's on a frolic of his own, no intention of advancing his employer's business his employer's not liable, there may be a case if the employer knew about this horseplay and hadn't tried to...”
11 hours, 45 min ago
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 327 of 512
15 hours, 35 min ago
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 313 of 512
Aug 11, 2026 10:25PM
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 299 of 512
Aug 11, 2026 09:02PM
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 286 of 512
Aug 11, 2026 07:44PM
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 276 of 512
Aug 11, 2026 06:43PM
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 256 of 512
This legal part is tricker than the previous
Aug 10, 2026 08:21PM
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 254 of 512
Aug 10, 2026 07:45PM
A Frolic of His Own


Patrick
Patrick is on page 238 of 512
Aug 10, 2026 11:19AM
A Frolic of His Own


Comments Showing 1-2 of 2 (2 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by Patrick (new) - added it

Patrick - “-You mean she's got one set of lawyers bringing this suit for foetal endangerment and another set to defend her abortion. No wonder they talk to each other.”

The legal absurdities in this book are quite hilariously absurd and wild.


message 2: by Patrick (new) - added it

Patrick In normal terms: she’s suing a hospital for the endangerment of her unborn child meanwhile she already aborted said unborn child and is defending that same abortion in a legal paternity case. It’s like a catch-22


back to top