Patrick’s Reviews > A Frolic of His Own > Status Update
Patrick
is on page 390 of 512
“Furthermore, since awards for sentimental family relationships are generally forbidden, and survivors may not seek damages for mental suffering or grief, he may even end with a negative value, going so far as to tempt the defendant, where contributory negligence is involved, to turn the tables and sue for recovery himself.”
Brutal o_O lol
— Aug 13, 2026 03:55PM
Brutal o_O lol
2 likes · Like flag
Patrick’s Previous Updates
Patrick
is on page 490 of 512
“…as an individual you could join in a suit against yourself as a public oficer,…the rule that one person cannot take the position of both plaintiff and defendant will not apply so long as the case does not add up to one party against himself…you might almost say that this is a suit between who you are and who you think you are, the question being which one is the plaintiff and which one is the defen...”
— Aug 15, 2026 01:24AM
Patrick
is on page 352 of 512
“—Like an office worker puts out an eye shooting paperclips with a rubberband they say he's on a frolic of his own, no intention of advancing his employer's business his employer's not liable, there may be a case if the employer knew about this horseplay and hadn't tried to...”
— Aug 12, 2026 01:38PM
Comments Showing 1-1 of 1 (1 new)
date
newest »
newest »
message 1:
by
Patrick
(new)
-
rated it 4 stars
Aug 13, 2026 03:59PM
In English: not only is the dead person’s emotional value of irrelevance to the court, but depending on the circumstances, the surviving family might actually be financially better off if the victim had never existed—and the defendant being sued for the death of the deceased could conceivably have a claim against the surviving family. 😅x_x
reply
|
flag