Corey’s Reviews > Darwin on Trial > Status Update
Corey
is on page 7 of 226
It's actually very alarming that a LAWYER wrote a book where I'm only 7 pages in and literally every argument hes made is a logical fallacy and he's presently ignoring the existence of evidence and also conflating Richard Dawkins with the scientific concensus
— 11 hours, 25 min ago
Like flag
Corey’s Previous Updates
Corey
is on page 5 of 226
Yall we are five pages in and we've got:
- appeal to emotion
- appeal to consequence
- inflation of conflict
- false equivocation
- moralistic fallacy
You know what we don't have?
Literally any evidence
— 19 hours, 22 min ago
- appeal to emotion
- appeal to consequence
- inflation of conflict
- false equivocation
- moralistic fallacy
You know what we don't have?
Literally any evidence
Corey
is on page 4 of 226
I am like four pages in and this guy who was a lawyer BTW has done like 10 different logical fallacies
It's kind of incredible
— 19 hours, 53 min ago
It's kind of incredible
Corey
is on page 3 of 226
Alright so this guy sucked but the problem is that a guy who sucks being an advocate of a scientific theory doesn't actually invalidate it in any way
I think there's a term for that fallacy even
— 20 hours, 1 min ago
I think there's a term for that fallacy even
Corey
is starting
Our lawyer author with no science background immediately makes it clear he has no science background by saying this: "Evolution is taught in the public schools (and presented in the media) not as a theory but as a fact"
Scientific theories ARE facts man.
Gravity is a theory also. But you would call me crazy if I suggested that we teach it's equally likely we just hold onto earth real tight with our feet
— 20 hours, 15 min ago
Scientific theories ARE facts man.
Gravity is a theory also. But you would call me crazy if I suggested that we teach it's equally likely we just hold onto earth real tight with our feet