Stetson’s Reviews > Misbehaving Science: Controversy and the Development of Behavior Genetics > Status Update
Stetson
is on page 90 of 320
AP covers the Jensen '69 controversy wrt its impact on Dobs' apolitical BG play of the 50s and argues it compels triangulation from the field.
— Oct 05, 2026 08:44AM
Like flag
Stetson’s Previous Updates
Stetson
is on page 190 of 320
Chapter on the genomics era is dated. It's post-candidate gene era but before huge biobanks, sib regression, RDR, GREML, and within-family designs.
— Oct 07, 2026 05:38PM
Stetson
is on page 120 of 320
Ch. 4 covers why the field privileged human research which he argues was a function of a subfield of clinical psychology dominating academics identifying with the BG label.
— Oct 06, 2026 08:07AM
Stetson
is on page 75 of 320
Panofsky thinks the 50/60s were halcyon founding years of BG before baddie A. Jensen showed up and made everyone confront his hereditarian arguments about race differences in IQ.
— Sep 20, 2026 07:06PM
Stetson
is on page 50 of 320
Panofsky spends a lot of time trying to define what a "misbehaving science" is, but there is nothing systematic about the effort. It lands as obviously incoherent. Many of the specific critiques that are previewed have been eclipsed by advances in genetics.
— Sep 13, 2026 01:56PM

