Nicole’s Reviews > The Lost King: The Search for Richard III > Status Update

She’s using graphology aka pseudoscience to get to know him better. This is actually insane. She is nuts

Bruh. She says he was approachable because he was told about some tea that someone had been insulted. That doesn’t mean shit. She just makes random assumptions

Bruh. She’s acting like she knows him. That she saw in his character it was unlikely he murdered children and instead sent them to safety. She doesn’t even know him. She only discovered his body based on vibes alone. She’s low key nuts and cries if anyone “disrespects” him aka says he has a hunchback instead of scoliosis. This is bonkers

She has such a hard on for Richard. She’s so dramatic. Why is why crying. She had a crying fit because they said hunchback. Jesus Christ. This is insane.

This book is also terrible….

This book is written for audiences familiar with the royal families. This is not for curious global/ American readers that know almost nothing about English history

This book is so boring. It’s just talking about digging in dirt and who she got funding from

It’s so interesting that she brought up the king being haunted by nightmares of battle and demons. Sounds like ancient PTSD. I wish she had explored that more rather than just moving on

She just brings up random topics like the river sawyer ???? archeological dig but like no context. I’ve never heard of these and have literally no idea what she’s talking about