Cassandra’s Reviews > The Human City: Urbanism for the Rest of Us > Status Update
Cassandra
is on page 115 of 304
Overemphasizes women's roles in child-rearing but also fails to link the empowerment of women and wealth with birth stats, and he makes fallacious links between housing density and city affordability, population growth, and employment opportunities. I really appreciate the amount of examples, but the logic is often fallacious. Great discussion book, but the author's opinions are poorly supported.
— Sep 01, 2019 10:01AM
Like flag
Cassandra’s Previous Updates
Cassandra
is 67% done
P.139 "...many migrants to Germany ... threaten to inject many of their homelands' maladies, ranging from jihadism to street crime, into what have been fairly prosperous and peaceful places" the problems with this fallacy should be self evident and well known in 2019
— Sep 03, 2019 10:53AM
Cassandra
is 35% done
Oh he does talk about women's empowerment but instead makes it sound like women are selfish and children's needs are unimportant. First, he says there aren't enough kids to care for grandparents. Now he says there aren't enough adults to care for kids.
— Sep 01, 2019 01:01PM
Cassandra
is on page 115 of 304
Very biased. Overemphasizes women's roles in child-rearing, and he makes really odd statements about the role of housing density in affordability, population growth, and employment opportunities. I really appreciate the amount of examples, but the logic is often fallacious. Great discussion book, but the author's opinions are poorly supported.
— Sep 01, 2019 09:59AM
Cassandra
is on page 19 of 304
Seems very male. The first chapter should be named, "let's grow and only families are people" and not "what is a city for"
— Apr 26, 2019 08:09AM
