Lia’s Reviews > Heidegger's Analytic: Interpretation, Discourse and Authenticity in "Being and Time" > Status Update

Ok, I can see where T.C. is a bit harsh on Husserl, though I'm not totally sure if it's unwarranted

Someone else said Taylor Carman is very cruel or harsh to Husserl in this book.

So far, what I'm getting is how badly Heidegger backstabbed Husserl.

On my account, Being and Time is an interpretive description of the conditions of interpretation, that is, the conditions of our ability to understand explicitly that and what entities, including ourselves, are.

H’s fundamental ontology marks a radical break w/ [expressivists]... Dasein is in principle never a finished thing, neither does it remain tragically unfinished or incomplete in the absence of properly expressive practices and institutions. Expression as such have no telos in anything like the wholeness of selfhood or character, nor is the self the kind of entity that can in principle ever be a finished whole.

What are the conditions already internal to our understanding of the contents of our own minds, over and beyond the merely physiological conditions of conscious awareness, of which we may be utterly ignorant?

transcendental questions inspiring Heidegger’s analytic:
What are the conditions informing our very idea of intentional phenomena as intentional?
What makes it possible for us even to conceive of anything like the theoretical attitudes involved in the explanatory strategies of science and common sense?