Alberto > Status Update
Alberto
is on page 108 of 684
Baker v Carr 1962, which defined the boundaries of which political questions were justiciable, and which opened the window for judicial involvement in legislative districting
— Jun 07, 2013 08:05PM
Like flag
Alberto’s Previous Updates
Alberto
is on page 235 of 684
Humphrey's Executor vs United States, regarding limits to presidential power to dismiss FTC commissioners and similar quasi-judicial officers
— Apr 20, 2020 11:03AM
Alberto
is on page 181 of 684
South Carolina v Katzenbach, challenging the Voting Rights Act of 1965
— Jan 14, 2015 04:52PM
Alberto
is on page 94 of 684
John Gibson's dissent in Eakin v Raub (1825), which attempts to provide a rebuttal of the judicial claim to the power to review acts of the legislature
— May 31, 2013 08:47PM
Alberto
is on page 89 of 684
Martin v Hunter's Lessee, 1816, in which the Supreme Court extended judicial review to act of the individual states Since judicial review was well-known to the members of the constitutional convention, why not mention it explicitly (one way or the other)? Seems a deliberate attempt to get it in surreptitiously while avoiding giving the anti-Federalists an argument against ratification by inserting it explicitly.
— May 19, 2013 08:56AM
Alberto
is on page 79 of 684
Marbury v Madison, 1803, establishing judicial review
— May 11, 2013 09:56AM
