Eve’s Reviews > Omnigender: A Trans-Religious Approach > Status Update

i might be reading this section wrong & need to talk with some jews about it but is this ending from the last paragraph of 190 thru 192 doing a cultural appropriation?

feinburg was/is a ML so that's pretty cool. I guess that's what people thought I was? but i wasn't i still had work to do because surviving heterosexism back then meant not challenging racism sadly for my case... ugh! regrets!

is about combatting what we today call the fascist-pipeline. however, as a commie, i would add that the news/the state (since the news sucks up to the state for govt & police press access) refusing to do mass line techniques is inherently done to prop up the fascist canvassers. so let's be aware of the collaboration here. that being said, i need to research deep canvassing developed circa 2008 onward & such.

we don't live in that sort of "democracy" anymore

very relevant for 2020 & onward, but the campaign finance reform possibility is a bit passe, like that's why revolution & anti-capitalism are considered more relevant now. seriously "imperialism" by lenin & "goliath" by stoller.

later down this page my concerns we're agreed with basically, but it's still awkward since this is stated as a long struggle, so it's like, why does it take so long?

so yeah, controlling menstruation as a form of disability justice & bodily autonomy & rights to body modification etc, all of these are important, but like when we have an omnigender society we're going to have a lot of diversity instead of uniformity, so that's why that point can be awkward & be turned towards social injustice.

i feel awkward about cyberfeminism because unless it's combined well with disability justice it can end up being like bioessentiallst thinking that we have to change the individual bodies as opposed to the social relationships. for example focusing more on controlling menstruation than breaking the boys' club, because this book has helped show that the heterosexist categories are not legal positivist.

Sexual-continuum according to Rothblatt & Omnigender according to Mollenkott, OMG yes I love interconnectivity. This is the part of the book I didn't read as a 6 year old because the religion pissed me off so much as someone who didn't have a religion yet.

OMG thank you for giving me a label to look up to affirm what I've been hearing! Basically the nature vs nuture dichotomy/binary is fake as fuck, instead that they exist at the same time is indeed called by some scholars cited in this book as "Developmental Systems Theory (DST)".