Alexis’s Reviews > Great Short Works of Henry James > Status Update

Alexis
Alexis is on page 90
Daisy Miller was alright, now I am reading Washing Square and I keep confusing it with the Age of Innocence and thinking of Daniel Day-Lewis and Winona Ryder as the characters, which is screwing things up.
Mar 16, 2011 08:39PM
Great Short Works of Henry James

flag

Alexis’s Previous Updates

Alexis
Alexis is on page 400
and by "like", I of course mean "write". Oops.
Apr 10, 2011 11:51AM
Great Short Works of Henry James


Alexis
Alexis is on page 400
Turn of the Screw--did he really like this? It's so...fun! This can't be the same guy.
Apr 10, 2011 11:50AM
Great Short Works of Henry James


Alexis
Alexis is on page 300
Okay, I think I will skip ahead to Turn of the Screw and consider my education in the short works of Henry James complete.
Apr 08, 2011 02:36PM
Great Short Works of Henry James


Alexis
Alexis is on page 285
Hey, Aspern Papers is really good. That is all.
Apr 05, 2011 09:17PM
Great Short Works of Henry James


Alexis
Alexis is on page 250
Kind of liked Washington Square. Definitely into Aspern Papers.
Mar 31, 2011 04:11PM
Great Short Works of Henry James


Alexis
Alexis is on page 20
Ashamed to say i have never read James. I am reading Daisy Miller first. Because it's the first one in the book.
Mar 12, 2011 03:52PM
Great Short Works of Henry James


Comments Showing 1-5 of 5 (5 new)

dateUp arrow    newest »

message 1: by [deleted user] (new)

I have a friend who danced on his grave. Poor lamb.


message 2: by Alexis (new) - added it

Alexis I am reminded, while reading this, how all the people I knew in grad school who were into James were insufferable "writer" types. Like, it was all about the craft and not the content. He's kind of a judgy little shite, isn't he? It's like less sympathetic Wharton (who I love).


message 3: by [deleted user] (new)

Dad was super into James in grad school...bwahaha. He also had a thing for the 18Th C I just don't get. I think he liked James's oral quality.

But yeah, James fans are a little loony.


message 4: by Alexis (new) - added it

Alexis Yeah, I don't hate it or anything, the writing is of course good, but there's just this twinge of pettiness about his descriptions that I don't love.
I can see being into the "Long 18th Century"--there's some good (and ZOMFG WEIRD) shit there.


message 5: by [deleted user] (new)

True, but Johnson? Barf.

I think what I don't like about 18C is the poetry, even though yeah, lots of ZOMFG weird to go around, and sometimes i like that. Give me the Romantics any day of the week.


back to top