JonM’s Reviews > Problems with Preterism: An Eschatology Built upon Exegetical Fallacies, Mistranslations, and the Misunderstanding of a Genre > Status Update

(10) not “providing biblical examples or anything contextual” to “support his argument”, and not understanding “concepts” to “mean what they normally mean to the ancient religious audience” (p.90)
(11) harboring “gnostic tendencies” (p.99)
(12) being “linguistically naive” (p.110)

(8) “manufacturing context” from the Olivet Discourse, which “is nothing more than eisegesis”, not “responsible exegesis of the text” (p.90)
(9) not using “linguistically sound methods” of interpretation of texts (p.90)

(3) promoting “liberalism and apostasy” according to his “superficial mindset” (p.82)
(4) promoting “some sort of docetic, mechanical dictation view of inspiration” (p.82)
(5) arguing contrary to what “exegesis would demand” (p.82)
(6) “simply misunderstanding predictive language” (p.86)
(7) “ignoring” what specific words and phrases of eschatological statements “actually mean” (p.88)

The Intro uses a lot of big boy rhetoric and preps the interested reader for tremendous insights to come.
Chapter one puts on a good show for a quick minute like a high school thug in the ring with Mike Tyson.
Round one was amusing.