Mitchell Chatfield’s Reviews > Max Stirner on the Path of Doubt > Status Update
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 118 of 236
Claiming the conversion of Marx into a Marxist was Stirner - pretty sure marx explicitly rejected this right up until his death? That’s a bit of a bold assertion to throw out
— Jan 04, 2024 04:10PM
Like flag
Mitchell’s Previous Updates
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 160 of 236
Finished main text. Addenda to be read.
— Jan 06, 2024 04:10PM
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 134 of 236
Pages 133 and 134 I suspect will be the basis of a lot of the eventual review. There are some speculative pro-capitalist claims which I’m not sure hold much if any water, especially given the very quote from Stirner seems to rebut such an assertion.
— Jan 06, 2024 02:25PM
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 114 of 236
It’s making slightly more sense in view of ‘what were the consequences of The Ego?’ but this is not at all evident
— Jan 04, 2024 03:54PM
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 105 of 236
Page 104 repeats, copy and paste, paragraphs from page 98. Further reinforcing that this does not appear to have been an edited work. I am also not sure what reference formatting style is used, as there is inconsistent italicisation, and some titles are contracted.
— Jan 03, 2024 04:17PM
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 92 of 236
Page 89 of this edition really raises the question ‘was this edited’ - what sort of published book includes a footnote that has a direction to the author to find a reference? That’s how I would write if it were a draft…
— Jan 02, 2024 04:02PM
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 74 of 236
For a book about Stirner there is an awful lot of Hegelian backstory - including Hegel himself (directly relevant) and Cieszkowski (not so sure on the relevance).
— Jan 01, 2024 03:45PM
Mitchell Chatfield
is on page 58 of 236
This book seems to argue in a sort of oblique or thematic way. It is nowhere near tight enough on a sentence to sentence scale. There are typos and repetitions and other superfluities. But despite that it seems to get across a synthesising view of Stirner and Hegel. I am seeming to understand the movements of the boom without each note being clear
— Dec 29, 2023 04:34PM

