Kelley’s Reviews > The Study Quran: A New Translation and Commentary > Status Update
Kelley
is on page 133 of 2048
Do not recommend this version of Q. Outdated and inconsistent translations. The idea of the footnoted tafsir is neat but the editors def make sure to present their own slant to specific issues (riba and intercession for example). And then sometimes just include incorrect or confusing footnotes that will only benefit those trying to attack the Quran. No wonder this seems to be popular with non Muslims and Christians.
— Jul 31, 2024 07:36AM
Like flag
Kelley’s Previous Updates
Kelley
is on page 315 of 2048
This translation, in addition to many errors in footnotes and the old timely language used, flat out promotes pluralism. If you want this in a Quran, that’s great. However any book which promotes its own bias (without doctrinal support) cannot be the best for use in academia. They allege 5:69 “argues for the continued validity of Judaism, Christianity and by extension other Divinely revealed religions…” sigh.
— Sep 10, 2026 08:33AM