Robie Trites’s Reviews > Fisman's Fraud: The Rise of Canadian Hate Science > Status Update

Fisman and co-authors engaged in fraudlent activity at three levels:

1. Scientific fraud: Fabrication and falsification of data AND results...

... 2. Health-related fraud:...faux similation...fabrications influence individuals' trust in the drug which results in greater uptake, some of whom go on to suffer an adverse event.

3. *Hate Science*: Advocating harm against an identifiable group...rights and freedoms."

"Fisman, Tuite and Amoako brought fraud to a new level within Canada, one that threatens to set avdangerous precedent going forward."

Willfull Backing

"...The refusal of researchers and institutions to self-correct in the face of such irrefutable evidence indicates a deep-set problem that requires a system-wide review in order to determine the root cause and make the necessary changes to restore integrity."

" There are five main reasons why this particular case of scientific misconduct requires attention: (1) the researchers' clear intent, (2) the crutial role they played in decieving the public, (3) the far- reaching impact of their fraudulent activity, (4) the willful backing by the establishment, and (5) the potential for FUTURE HARM."

"The medical sector gained greater influence in shaping public policy."

"Weak controls, huge financial and career incentives alongside a largely unchallenged excuse for bypassing medical and legal standards created the perfect envionment for abuse."

Dr. Watteel leaves out a key word "enabling". However, this fits into her blindspot of verification.

enabling abuse*.

Because she is not a healthcare worker, she does not understand the vaccine faith. Now what I said is misleading but also true. It wouldn't be a faith if the healthcare workers knew it was a faith. So, the revised statement, should actually be a question. 'Why don't the healthcare workers know about the vaccine faith?'

One word:

Verification.

(Implied prefix)From the perspective of immunity," The Omicron wave should have put to rest the scapegoating and the 'theoretical' reduction of transmission hypothesis--and momentum appeared to be moving in that direction with provinces dropping their vaccine passports throughout Feb and Mar 2022."Now her next sentence is incredulity,but an observation of fact. Dispite this "cling to" does describe the vaccine faith.

"It should be noted that even when the Science Table reccomended C-19 vaccine certificates in summer 2021, their science brief acknowledged that there was 'no scientific evidence of the direct impact of vaccine certificates on SARS-CoV-2 transmission.'"

The Mod., or Pfi. Clinical trials "did not evaluate the vaccines' ability to reduce transmission." The trials said transmission was "beyond the scope of the study."

"In summary, the Ontario Science Table had a propensity for producing overinflated projections of C-19 hospitalizations and ICU admittance, erring onnthe side of harsh restrictions and encouraging vaccine uptake even amoung young groups with extremely low risk of serious C-19 such as children and youth."

I read the 'opinion' piece published in The Sun on the 26th Aug 2022. I juxtiposed it with the mandate. *sigh*

"The answer is no.We aren't going to do it [Vaccine Passport]. We aren't going to have a split society." -- Ontario Premier Doug Ford, July 15, 2021
-----
"Vaccinations will be mandatory for certian indoor settings where the risk of transmission is highest, because masks aren't always worn, including restaurants, bars, and casinos, amoung others. Enforcement will led by bylaw officers..." Ont. Pr. D. Ford Sept1,2021