30 books
—
16 voters
Bad Science Books
Showing 1-50 of 230

by (shelved 11 times as bad-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 44,598 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 2 times as bad-science)
avg rating 4.29 — 79,252 ratings — published 1995

by (shelved 2 times as bad-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,087 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 2 times as bad-science)
avg rating 4.13 — 1,000,798 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.07 — 310 ratings — published 2010

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.27 — 2,088 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.37 — 37,725 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 180 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.41 — 322 ratings — published 2016

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 21,879 ratings — published 2015

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.73 — 340 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.17 — 574,299 ratings — published 2011

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.01 — 374 ratings — published 1999

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.33 — 153,597 ratings — published 2024

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.65 — 797 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.23 — 2,776 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.41 — 278,664 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.06 — 3,381 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.96 — 1,607,163 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.56 — 1,042 ratings — published 2008

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.20 — 3,363 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.14 — 51 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.25 — 340 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.42 — 38 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.55 — 60 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.84 — 226 ratings — published 1969

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.38 — 174,862 ratings — published 2012

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.76 — 695,218 ratings — published 2001

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.25 — 314 ratings — published 1915

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.62 — 1,870 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.67 — 6,821 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.04 — 6,020 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.51 — 2,677 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.31 — 33,341 ratings — published 2022

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.79 — 197 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.62 — 42 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.89 — 6,221 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.05 — 1,547 ratings — published 2021

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.07 — 44,702 ratings — published 2018

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.57 — 336 ratings — published 2013

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.39 — 3,236 ratings — published

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.11 — 861 ratings — published 1996

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.00 — 65 ratings — published 1987

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.08 — 90 ratings — published 1993

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.80 — 1,242,963 ratings — published 2020

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.05 — 86 ratings — published 1885

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 3.90 — 42,260 ratings — published 2017

by (shelved 1 time as bad-science)
avg rating 4.26 — 6,376 ratings — published 2021

“Pulling bad science apart is the best teaching gimmick I know for explaining how good science really works.”
― I Think You'll Find It's a Bit More Complicated Than That
― I Think You'll Find It's a Bit More Complicated Than That
“The psychological view of ME led to the controversial and now debunked PACE trial—PACE is “Pacing, graded Activity, and Cognitive behaviour therapy; a randomised Evaluation”... As the trial progressed and the results did not meet the authors’ expectations, they simply lowered the threshold to define improvement. In some cases, those whose condition had deteriorated were classed as “recovered”. That is simply not good science.”
―
―