Discover new books on Goodreads
Meet your next favorite book
to-read
(995)
currently-reading (56)
read (319)
did-not-finish (0)
espionnage-thrillers (40)
fine-literature (36)
political-science-and-international (33)
sandford-novels (26)
military-titles-and-training (23)
intelligence-studies (22)
modern-fiction (20)
counterterrorism (17)
currently-reading (56)
read (319)
did-not-finish (0)
espionnage-thrillers (40)
fine-literature (36)
political-science-and-international (33)
sandford-novels (26)
military-titles-and-training (23)
intelligence-studies (22)
modern-fiction (20)
counterterrorism (17)
afghanistan
(15)
social-topics (15)
criminal-justice (13)
military-history-and-fiction (13)
military-technology (12)
critical-thinking-reflection-logic (11)
dystopian (11)
international-law (11)
history (10)
motivational-spiritual (10)
ancient-classics (9)
psychology (8)
social-topics (15)
criminal-justice (13)
military-history-and-fiction (13)
military-technology (12)
critical-thinking-reflection-logic (11)
dystopian (11)
international-law (11)
history (10)
motivational-spiritual (10)
ancient-classics (9)
psychology (8)
Dr. Phoenix
is currently reading
bookshelves:
currently-reading,
counterterrorism,
intelligence-studies,
middle-eastern-studies,
military-titles-and-training,
political-science-and-international
“For the whole earth is the tomb of famous men; not only are they commemorated by columns and inscriptions in their own country, but in foreign lands there dwells also an unwritten memorial of them, graven not on stone but in the hearts of men. Make them your examples, and, esteeming courage to be freedom and freedom to be happiness, do not weigh too nicely the perils of war."
[Funeral Oration of Pericles]”
― History of the Peloponnesian War
[Funeral Oration of Pericles]”
― History of the Peloponnesian War
“Foolish liberals who are trying to read the Second Amendment out of the Constitution by claiming it's not an individual right or that it's too much of a public safety hazard, don't see the danger in the big picture. They're courting disaster by encouraging others to use the same means to eliminate portions of the Constitution they don't like.”
―
―
“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Goodreads Librarians Group
— 334982 members
— last activity 0 minutes ago
Goodreads Librarians are volunteers who help ensure the accuracy of information about books and authors in the Goodreads' catalog. The Goodreads Libra ...more
Dr. Phoenix’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Dr. Phoenix’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Dr. Phoenix
Lists liked by Dr. Phoenix








































