15,145 books
—
17,352 voters
daniel chiaretti
https://www.goodreads.com/dchiaretti
to-read
(75)
currently-reading (4)
read (515)
quarentena (10)
na-fila (7)
dicas-sugestões-e-listas (0)
filosofia (135)
literatura (200)
política (129)
brasil (71)
mulheres (67)
história (65)
currently-reading (4)
read (515)
quarentena (10)
na-fila (7)
dicas-sugestões-e-listas (0)
filosofia (135)
literatura (200)
política (129)
brasil (71)
mulheres (67)
história (65)
americanos
(48)
franceses (35)
musica (24)
italiano (23)
quadrinhos (23)
republicanismo (23)
direito (21)
cultura-pop (18)
latino-americano (18)
gregos (16)
teatro (15)
arte (14)
franceses (35)
musica (24)
italiano (23)
quadrinhos (23)
republicanismo (23)
direito (21)
cultura-pop (18)
latino-americano (18)
gregos (16)
teatro (15)
arte (14)
Claro, se as sacristias úmidas onde as preces são pesadas e pagas como especiarias, se as lojas de roupas usadas nas quais flutuam farrapos que fazem fenecer todas as ilusões da vida mostrando-nos onde terminam nossas festas, se essas duas
...more
“The so-called paradox of freedom is the argument that freedom in the sense of absence of any constraining control must lead to very great restraint, since it makes the bully free to enslave the meek. The idea is, in a slightly different form, and with very different tendency, clearly expressed in Plato.
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
Less well known is the paradox of tolerance: Unlimited tolerance must lead to the disappearance of tolerance. If we extend unlimited tolerance even to those who are intolerant, if we are not prepared to defend a tolerant society against the onslaught of the intolerant, then the tolerant will be destroyed, and tolerance with them. — In this formulation, I do not imply, for instance, that we should always suppress the utterance of intolerant philosophies; as long as we can counter them by rational argument and keep them in check by public opinion, suppression would certainly be unwise. But we should claim the right to suppress them if necessary even by force; for it may easily turn out that they are not prepared to meet us on the level of rational argument, but begin by denouncing all argument; they may forbid their followers to listen to rational argument, because it is deceptive, and teach them to answer arguments by the use of their fists or pistols. We should therefore claim, in the name of tolerance, the right not to tolerate the intolerant. We should claim that any movement preaching intolerance places itself outside the law, and we should consider incitement to intolerance and persecution as criminal, in the same way as we should consider incitement to murder, or to kidnapping, or to the revival of the slave trade, as criminal.”
― The Open Society and Its Enemies
“Thirty--the promise of a decade of loneliness, a thinning list of single men to know, a thinning brief-case of enthusiasm, thinning hair.”
― The Great Gatsby
― The Great Gatsby
“Those who profess to favor freedom and yet depreciate agitation, are people who want crops without ploughing the ground; they want rain without thunder and lightning; they want the ocean without the roar of its many waters. The struggle may be a moral one, or it may be a physical one, or it may be both. But it must be a struggle. Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will.”
―
―
“[A]nother important difference between tourist and traveler is that the former accepts his own civilization without question; not so the traveler, who compares it with the others, and rejects those elements he finds not to his liking.”
― The Sheltering Sky
― The Sheltering Sky
“When evening comes, I return home and go into my study. On the threshold I strip off my muddy, sweaty, workday clothes, and put on the robes of court and palace, and in this graver dress I enter the antique courts of the ancients and am welcomed by them, and there I taste the food that alone is mine, and for which I was born. And there I make bold to speak to them and ask the motives of their actions, and they, in their humanity, reply to me. And for the space of four hours I forget the world, remember no vexation, fear poverty no more, tremble no more at death: I pass indeed into their world.”
―
―
daniel’s 2024 Year in Books
Take a look at daniel’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Biography, Book Club, Children's, Classics, Cookbooks, Cooking, Crime, Ebooks, Fiction, Food, Historical fiction, History, Memoir, Music, Mystery, Non-fiction, Philosophy, Politics, Religion, Romance, Travel, and Young-adult
Polls voted on by daniel
Lists liked by daniel





























