Matt Uebel

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Matt.

http://www.realityzealot.com
https://www.goodreads.com/realityzealot

The Terror
Matt Uebel is currently reading
bookshelves: currently-reading
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Loading...
R. Scott Bakker
“If soot stains your tunic, dye it black. This is vengeance.”
R. Scott Bakker, The Thousandfold Thought

“In order for a god to be all-knowing, he must know even the fact of his own omniscience. But can he do this? He may know the totality of facts constituting the world; call this Y. But in order to know that he has mastered Y, he must also know that 'There are no facts unknown to me' — and this is beyond Y.

It seems impossible that a god (or anyone) could ever be sure that nothing exists beyond his ken. It makes no sense to imagine [a god] arriving at this limit, peering beyond it (at what?), and satisfying himself no further facts exist. But without this certainty he cannot be sure of his own omniscience, and so does not know everything.

A theist might argue that his god has created all the facts in existence. But an omniscient god would have to be sure of even this — that he is the sole creator, and that there are no facts unknown to him. And how could he come to this knowledge?”
Roland Puccetti

R. Scott Bakker
“Do not mistake me, Inrithi. In this much Conphas is right. You are all staggering drunks to me. Boys who would play at war when you should kennel with your mothers. You know nothing of war. War is dark. Black as pitch. It is not a God. It does not laugh or weep. It rewards neither skill not daring. It is not a trial of souls, nor the measure of wills. Even less is it a tool, a means to some womanish end. It is merely the place where the iron bones of the earth meet the hollow bones of men and break them.

You have offered me war, and I have accepted. Nothing more. I will not regret your losses. I will not bow my head before your funeral pyres. I will not rejoice at your triumphs. But I have taken the wager. I will suffer with you. I will put Fanim to the sword, and drive their wives and children to the slaughter. And when I sleep, I will dream of their lamentations and be glad of heart.”
R. Scott Bakker, The Darkness That Comes Before

“I know, I know: it can be frustrating as hell. But people have an unfortunate habit of assuming they understand the reality just because they understood the analogy. You dumb down brain surgery enough for a preschooler to think he understands it, the little tyke’s liable to grab a microwave scalpel and start cutting when no one’s looking.”
Peter Watts, Echopraxia

Daniel C. Dennett
“Some years ago, there was a lovely philosopher of science and journalist in Italy named Giulio Giorello, and he did an interview with me. And I don’t know if he wrote it or not, but the headline in Corriere della Sera when it was published was "Sì, abbiamo un'anima. Ma è fatta di tanti piccoli robot – "Yes, we have a soul, but it’s made of lots of tiny robots." And I thought, exactly. That’s the view. Yes, we have a soul, but in what sense? In the sense that our brains, unlike the brains even of dogs and cats and chimpanzees and dolphins, our brains have functional structures that give our brains powers that no other brains have - powers of look-ahead, primarily. We can understand our position in the world, we can see the future, we can understand where we came from. We know that we’re here. No buffalo knows it’s a buffalo, but we jolly well know that we’re members of Homo sapiens, and it’s the knowledge that we have and the can-do, our capacity to think ahead and to reflect and to evaluate and to evaluate our evaluations, and evaluate the grounds for our evaluations.

It’s this expandable capacity to represent reasons that we have that gives us a soul. But what’s it made of? It’s made of neurons. It’s made of lots of tiny robots. And we can actually explain the structure and operation of that kind of soul, whereas an eternal, immortal, immaterial soul is just a metaphysical rug under which you sweep your embarrassment for not having any explanation.”
Daniel C. Dennett

18539 SFBRP Listeners — 664 members — last activity Nov 19, 2025 05:51AM
A group for listeners of the Science Fiction Book Review Podcast.
year in books
Ward Pl...
932 books | 4,595 friends

Roxanne...
486 books | 65 friends

Luke Bu...
755 books | 889 friends

Gregory...
1,830 books | 250 friends

Gordon ...
532 books | 408 friends

Andrew
614 books | 76 friends

Rebecca...
231 books | 115 friends

Redeagl
1,435 books | 211 friends

More friends…
Accelerando by Charles Stross
Transhuman Science Fiction
152 books — 186 voters
How to Create a Mind by Ray KurzweilGödel, Escher, Bach by Douglas R. HofstadterPhi by Giulio TononiThe Rapture of the Nerds by Cory DoctorowBlindsight by Peter Watts
Philosophy of Mind
209 books — 105 voters

More…



Polls voted on by Matt

Lists liked by Matt