Sign in with Facebook
793 books
—
906 voters
Kelley
https://www.goodreads.com/ksceccato
Kelley
is currently reading
progress:
(50%)
"Dang it, Agnes, read a BOOK once in a while!
Heroines who lack imagination try my patience. I didn’t read any further than the first book in Mistborn Era 1 because of this. Please stop making me want to quit you, Agnes." — Mar 28, 2026 12:09PM
"Dang it, Agnes, read a BOOK once in a while!
Heroines who lack imagination try my patience. I didn’t read any further than the first book in Mistborn Era 1 because of this. Please stop making me want to quit you, Agnes." — Mar 28, 2026 12:09PM
“Atticus told me to delete the adjectives and I'd have the facts.”
― To Kill a Mockingbird
― To Kill a Mockingbird
“What is a woman's place in this modern world? Jasnah Kholin's words read. I rebel against this question, though so many of my peers ask it. The inherent bias in the inquiry seems invisible to so many of them. They consider themselves progressive because they are willing to challenge many of the assumptions of the past.
They ignore the greater assumption--that a 'place' for women must be defined and set forth to begin with. Half of the population must somehow be reduced to the role arrived at by a single conversation. No matter how broad that role is, it will be--by-nature--a reduction from the infinite variety that is womanhood.
I say that there is no role for women--there is, instead, a role for each woman, and she must make it for herself. For some, it will be the role of scholar; for others, it will be the role of wife. For others, it will be both. For yet others, it will be neither.
Do not mistake me in assuming I value one woman's role above another. My point is not to stratify our society--we have done that far to well already--my point is to diversify our discourse.
A woman's strength should not be in her role, whatever she chooses it to be, but in the power to choose that role. It is amazing to me that I even have to make this point, as I see it as the very foundation of our conversation.”
― Words of Radiance
They ignore the greater assumption--that a 'place' for women must be defined and set forth to begin with. Half of the population must somehow be reduced to the role arrived at by a single conversation. No matter how broad that role is, it will be--by-nature--a reduction from the infinite variety that is womanhood.
I say that there is no role for women--there is, instead, a role for each woman, and she must make it for herself. For some, it will be the role of scholar; for others, it will be the role of wife. For others, it will be both. For yet others, it will be neither.
Do not mistake me in assuming I value one woman's role above another. My point is not to stratify our society--we have done that far to well already--my point is to diversify our discourse.
A woman's strength should not be in her role, whatever she chooses it to be, but in the power to choose that role. It is amazing to me that I even have to make this point, as I see it as the very foundation of our conversation.”
― Words of Radiance
Rated YA-MA
— 3102 members
— last activity Nov 16, 2025 01:48PM
A group for adult lovers of Young Adult fiction. We feature a different YA book genres and topics with our group reads, in order to cater to a varie ...more
Kelley’s 2025 Year in Books
Take a look at Kelley’s Year in Books, including some fun facts about their reading.
5,036 books
|
163 friends
3,012 books
|
80 friends
3,181 books
|
148 friends
789 books
|
4,157 friends
2,233 books
|
29 friends
1,252 books
|
16 friends
827 books
|
104 friends
2,416 books
|
77 friends
More friends…
Favorite Genres
Polls voted on by Kelley
Lists liked by Kelley
