Discover new books on Goodreads
Meet your next favorite book

Jim Howe

Add friend
Sign in to Goodreads to learn more about Jim.


Same Sex Relation...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
The Complete Work...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
Morning and Eveni...
Rate this book
Clear rating

 
See all 16 books that Jim is reading…
Loading...
Carl F.H. Henry
“Common sense requires modern man’s recognition of the scientific method as a spectacularly useful instrumentality for transforming our environment. Respect and gratitude are indeed due the scientist for many comforts and conveniences furnished to modern living, often as the fruit of painstakingly sacrificial research and experimentation, although in recent times not often without financial reward. This practical success of science inclines many persons to a tacit acceptance of the scientific world-picture of external reality as a realm merely of impersonal processes and mathematically connectible sequences. Charles H. Malik observes rightly that all too often the highly merited prestige of scientists in their own fields of competence is transferred to areas of publicly expressed opinion in which they are novices.”
Carl F.H. Henry, God, Revelation and Authority

John Stonestreet
“Addiction is the result of an emptiness in the soul, not of what’s put into the body. Spiritual harm is much more insidious and is the real reason empty selves turn to drugs and alcohol. In a culture of alienation and fragmentation, people search for something to save them from their pain. For many, drugs and alcohol become substitute saviors. However, these substances are an inadequate replacement for the real thing. Drugs and alcohol can only anesthetize people, dulling life for a few fleeting moments, but they cannot satisfy empty souls. Instead, they compound brokenness and multiply the devastation of sin. Real rescue can be found only in God’s Story.”
John Stonestreet, A Practical Guide to Culture: Helping the Next Generation Navigate Today's World

Francis A. Schaeffer
“God has made us with proper desires,  but if there is not a proper contentment on my part, to this extent I am in revolt against God, and of course revolt is the whole central problem of sin. When I lack proper contentment, either I have forgotten that God is God, or I have ceased to be submissive to him. We are now speaking about a practical test to judge if we are coveting against God. A quiet disposition and a heart giving thanks at any given moment is the real test of the extent to which we love God at that moment.”
Francis A. Schaeffer, True Spirituality

Carl F.H. Henry
“Rationalism has swerved between two radical extremes in its attitude toward revelation. There is the widespread present admission that reason is barren as a source of final truth, but that it would be a sell-out to madness to invoke revelational theology. But a very different tradition in the history of philosophy, not without recent representatives, holds that philosophy finds its ideal intellectual expression and summit in theology. For Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus and even Spinoza, philosophy is at its apex an intellectual love of the Divine. It is this regard for theology as “the inner side of a philosophy,” to use Miss Emmet’s phrase (The Nature of Metaphysical Thinking, p. 150), that turns some systems of metaphysics into a religious faith, albeit a false one. Such outlooks on the surface eliminate a direct clash between philosophy and theology. But, insofar as theology is viewed as the capstone of speculative philosophy, they do so only by denying the comprehensive intellectual implications of revealed theology, and in principle even deny to theology its own right of survival on the basis of special divine disclosure. Sooner or later—and usually sooner than its advocates think—this view works itself around to the other, in which rationalists suspect and disown all theology, only to discover at last that in doing so they have both idolatrized reason and emptied it into a vain thing.”
Carl F.H. Henry, God, Revelation and Authority

Carl F.H. Henry
“The mystic must, of course, respect the canons of reason and the conventions of logic if he is to communicate anything whatever about ineffable reality. And yet, ultimate reality either is capable of intelligible representation, and in that case ineffability is a misnomer, or it is not, in which case the mystic has no ground whatever for speech about the Ineffable. It is one thing for a person to claim that he has seen a flying saucer, and on that basis to argue—contrary to those who have not— that such weird mechanisms exist, but it is more preposterous for someone to describe a reality which is said to be inherently inexpressible. It simply makes no sense for anyone publicly to claim that he has intuited the inexpressible. The mystic cannot formulate the experience which other men should have, if they would share his belief, since in the case of an “inexpressible intuition” nobody could know what anybody else’s experience was.”
Carl F.H. Henry, God, Revelation and Authority

year in books
Kathleen
199 books | 979 friends

J. Bill...
2 books | 106 friends

Jean Pi...
512 books | 161 friends

Troy An...
34 books | 703 friends

Lesa En...
259 books | 1,166 friends

Deborah...
45 books | 45 friends

Mckinle...
65 books | 687 friends

Brian
139 books | 88 friends

More friends…


Polls voted on by Jim

Lists liked by Jim